The Post-Easter Jesus – His Empty Tomb and Resurrection

 

            In this section we are dealing with the heart and soul of what Christianity is all about.   As St. Paul explains it the members of the nascent church in Corinth:

 

            For I handed on to you as of first importance what I in turn had received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas [i.e., Peter] then to the twelve.  Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died.  Then he appeared to James [the brother of the Lord], then to all the apostles.  Last of all, he appeared also to me. (1 Corinthians 15:3-8)

 

            And to reinforce the importance of his resurrection he told them further that:

 

            Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say there is no resurrection of the dead?  If there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ has not been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our proclamation has been in vain and your faith has been in vain. . . . But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who have died.  For since death came through a human being, the resurrection of the dead has also come through a human being; for as all die in Adam, so all will be made alive in Christ.  But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, then at his coming those who belong to Christ.  Then comes the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, after he has destroyed every ruler and every authority and power.  For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.  The last enemy to be destroyed is death.  For God has put all things in subjection under his feet. (1 Corinthians 15:12-27 passim)

 

            Modern scholarship, however, questions the existence of his empty tomb on the Sunday following his burial the preceding Friday.  Even on the initial discovery of the empty tomb by Mary Magdalene and the other Mary, who ran back to tell his disciples about the disappearance of his body, some of the guards who had also observed that the tomb was empty  “went into the city and told the chief priests everything that had happened.  After the priests had assembled with the elders, they devised a plan to give a large sum of money to the soldiers, telling them, ‘You must say, ‘his disciples came by night and stole him away while we were asleep.’  If this comes to the governor’s ears, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.’  So they took the money and did as they were directed.  And this story is still told among the Jews to this day.” (Matthew 28:11-15).  This story even persisted long afterward.  Concurring in a theory first published by Hermann Samuel Reimarus in 1778, Albert Schweitzer wrote in 1906  that Jesus’ disciples decided after his death “Why not then continue this mode of life?  They would surely find a sufficient number of faithful souls who would join them in directing their hopes toward a second coming of the Messiah, and while awaiting the future glory, would share possessions with them.  So they stole the body of Jesus and hid it, and proclaimed to all the world that he would soon return.  They prudently waited, however, for fifty days to make this announcement, in order that the body, if it should be found, might be unrecognizable.”[1]  Another tale of removal surfaced during the 2nd century that claimed it was the gardener who had an available tomb close to his vegetable patch.  He told those who took him from the cross to place him there.  Then fearing that crowds of people coming to the site might trample his garden he moved him to another tomb.[2]  The 20th century Jesus Seminar scholars reject the idea of the empty tomb altogether.  The majority voted all four gospel stories using black beads meaning “This information is improbable.  It does not fit verifiable evidence; it is largely or entirely fictive.”[3] One of their well-known members, John Dominic Crossan, even “suggested that Jesus may not have been taken down from the cross and buried properly, according to Jewish custom; or that, if his body had been taken down, it may have been thrown in a ditch, covered with lime, and left for carrion for animals.”[4]

 

            The second attempt by historians to explain the empty tomb was to assume that Jesus didn’t actually die on the cross but fell into a coma from which he later revived.  The most well known of these resuscitation speculations was written in a two book volume by Herbert Paulus in the early 19th century.[5]  As recounted by Albert Schweitzer in his book on the historical Jesus: “The lance thrust merely served the purpose of a phlebotomy [a medicinal letting of blood].  The cool grave and the aromatic unguents continued the process of resuscitation, until finally the storm and the earthquake aroused Jesus to full consciousness.  Fortunately the earthquake had also the effect of rolling away the stone from the mouth of the grave.  The Lord stripped off the grave clothes and put on a gardener’s dress which He managed to procure.  That was what made Mary, as we are told in John xx.15, take him for the gardener.  Through the women, He sends a message to His disciples bidding them meet him in Galilee, and himself sets out to go thither.  At Emmaus, as the dusk was falling, he met two of His followers, who at first failed to recognize Him because His countenance was so disfigured by his sufferings.  But His manner of giving thanks at the breaking of bread, and the nail prints in his uplifted hands, revealed to them who he was.  From them He learns where His disciples are, returns to Jerusalem, and appears unexpectedly among them.  This is the explanation of the apparent contradiction between the message pointing to Galilee and the appearances in Jerusalem.”[6]

 

             A later 20th century writer, Hugh Schonfield, believes not only that Jesus survived his crucifixion but that he also (possibly with the assistance of Joseph of Arimathea and others, not including his disciples or the women he was closest to), was responsible for seeing that all that had been foretold by the prophets about the Messiah was fulfilled by him. “It is well to remind ourselves that Jesus was positive that he was the Messiah of Israel and applied himself in a remarkable manner to carrying out the predictions as he understood them. . . There can be no clear proof but we are entitled to imagine him, as we have done, regaining consciousness after he was taken from the tomb, and using these precious minutes to beg his friends to deliver a message to his disciples.  He would repeat what was so much a part of him, the Scriptures relating to his suffering and revival.  ‘Tell them these things’ he may have urged. ‘They must believe.  Tell them that when I have risen I will meet them in Galilee as I said, and afterwards enter into glory’”[7] Consequently, Schonfield believes, Jesus actually dies and is reburied in another location. (Just how they manage to do this with guards supposedly standing outside a tomb sealed with a huge stone, he doesn’t say.)  When Mary and the other women arrive at the tomb where Jesus was placed after being taken down from the cross, they discover to their amazement that the stone has been rolled away. 

 

            As they entered the tomb, they saw a young man, dressed in a white robe, sitting on the right side; and they were alarmed.  But he said to them, “Do not be alarmed; you are looking  for Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified.  He has been raised; he is not here.  Look, there is the place they laid him.  But go, tell his disciples and Peter that he is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see him, just as he told you.”  So they went out and fled from the tomb, for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.

(Mark 16:5-8)

 

            At this point Mark, the earliest of the gospel writers, ends his account.  Additional endings were added later to be more in keeping with the other gospel writers’ confirmation of the empty tomb by his disciples and his post-Easter appearances to them and to others.  The fact that the other gospel accounts of the empty tomb and appearances display marked dissimilarity attest to their not copying stories from each other or from Mark’s gospel.  As discussed earlier, however, both Matthew’s and Luke’s gospels do contain passages not found in Mark but in an unknown document scholars have named the Q gospel.  There is a reference in that gospel that reports Jesus as saying, “Unless you carry your own cross and follow me, you are not worthy.”  However, a footnote on this passage by the editors states that: “The Romans crucified two thousand Jews during the rebellion that followed King Herod the Great’s death in 4 B.C.E., so Jesus’ followers were well-acquainted with crucifixion even before his death.  It was a common practice in these executions to have the condemned person carry his own cross to the place of crucifixion.”[8]  There are no references in that document however to Jesus’ death and resurrection.

 

            It is not surprising, however, that in spite of the unanimous reports by all of the gospel writers that the tomb where Jesus was laid on Friday was found empty on Sunday morning that the Jesus Seminar scholars were skeptical not only about the empty tomb but also about his subsequent appearances to Mary Magdalene, his disciples and others. These New Testament historians nearly always attribute any identification of Jesus as the Messiah or the Son of God as editorial redaction since all of the gospels were written 40 to 60 years after his death and resurrection and therefore represent embellishment of stories claiming him to be divine.  Therefore, “On the basis of the aggregate evidence of these stories and reports, the Jesus Seminar agreed that the resurrection of Jesus did not involve the resuscitation of a corpse [and] If the resurrection of Jesus did not involve the resuscitation of a corpse and if a christophany [a vision of Christ] had developed out of an angelophany [a vision of an angel], it follows that: Belief in Jesus’ resurrection did not depend on what happened to his body. . . In view of the nature of the appearances and the late emergence of stories representing the resurrection as physical and palpable, the Seminar concluded: The body of Jesus decayed as do other corpses.  All the evidence, when taken together, seemed to suggest that The resurrection was not an event that happened on the first Easter Sunday; it was not an event that could have been recorded by a video camera.  The Seminar followed this trail of evidence to its conclusion, which they formulated as follows: Since the earlier strata of the New Testament contain no appearance stories, it does not seem necessary for Christian faith to believe the literal veracity of any of the later narratives. [9] (The above portions highlighted in bold type are shown in red type in the quoted document signifying “The historical reliability of this information is virtually certain.  It is supported by a preponderance of evidence.”)

 

            To counter the conclusions stated above by the Jesus Seminar scholars one has only to note that 1 in 3 persons living on earth today identify themselves as Christian (about 2.1 billion out of 6.3 billion people) and ask how it would be possible for this explosive growth to occur without the testimony of many hundreds of eyewitnesses to the reality of his resurrection 2,000 years ago.  Surely something earth-shaking and unforgettable occurred in Jerusalem that first Easter morning and over the ensuing forty days that forever changed those who witnessed these events.  Despite the many differences in the gospel accounts reported about these momentous events there were nevertheless a substantial number of agreements.  These dissimilarities are not unlike the testimony of a number of eyewitnesses to a crime reported at a trial in a courtroom.  Their very differences in recollection lend credibility to the events that each of them is describing.  The writers of the gospels therefore are quite possibly reporting that which they themselves either personally witnessed or reporting that which happened to those with whom they were personally acquainted.

 

             From the readings of Edgar Cayce, for example, we read that Mark’s gospel, the earliest to be circulated, was written by John Mark, the son of Marcus and Josie.  His mother Josie was the sister of Jesus’ mother Mary.  Further we learn that John Mark was healed of an infirmity at age twelve by his associations with his cousins John the Baptist and Jesus. He was the one at whose house Peter the apostle came when he was released from prison and also was a companion of Peter in his travels after Jesus’ resurrection. Later he was an associate and companion of the apostle Paul and Barnabus.  He was the first compiler of a letter that became know as Mark in collaboration with the eye witnesses Peter and Barnabus.  Cayce goes on to tell us that Mark’s gospel was written during the year 59 A.D. during Mark’s 34th year.[10]  Matthew’s gospel, as noted earlier, borrowed heavily from Mark’s gospel.  However, the Cayce records also tell us that there had been some distribution of the acts, life and deeds of Jesus that “had been carried to many of the various [Christian] groups before Mark’s was accepted, and before Matthew’s was given was written some eighteen years later. [i.e., 77 A. D.] [Furthermore, we are told that while Matthews and Mark’s gospels  share many of the same sayings and stories – the Q Gospel perhaps] Matthew was written from the churches in Pamphylia while Mark wrote from Rome.”[11]

 

            In another of Cayce’s readings we are told that the gospel of Luke was actually written by a kinsman of Luke named Lucius, whose name was often confused with that of Luke.  Moreover, they frequently traveled together and after the conversation of Saul (thereafter known as Paul) they both were closely associated with him and his activities. Hence not only the gospel of Luke but also the book of Acts, which is primarily about Paul and his journeys, was written by Lucius.[12]  Although neither John Mark, Luke, or Lucius was among the original twelve apostles of Jesus, all were among the seventy disciples sent out two by two’s to heal the sick and preach the good news of the kingdom according to Luke’s gospel (Chapter 10:1-17) just as the original twelve were sent out two by two’s described in all three of the synoptic gospels.  They therefore undoubtedly were among the many eye-witnesses to Jesus’ post-Easter appearances.  Cayce does not tell us who wrote John’s gospel although tradition attributes it to the beloved disciple, John, to whom Jesus from the cross gave the responsibility of caring for his mother.  Cayce affirms that at the time of Jesus’ ascension, fifty days after his resurrection, she became a dweller in his home near Bethany.  He also tells us that he had a summer home on Lake Gennesaret in Galilee, and that he was the wealthiest of his disciples. His household then consisted not only of Jesus’ mother, Mary, but of his own mother, Elois, who was Mary’s sister, and Mary Magdalene.[13]  We have the testimony of John himself that he is an eye-witness to the crucifixion with these words: “He who saw this has testified so that you also may believe.  His testimony is true, and he knows that he tells the truth.” – John 19:35.  Again toward the end of the gospel he, or the writer of the gospel, tells us: “This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and has written them, and we know that his testimony is true.” John 21:24.  According to Papias, one of John's disciples, John later went to the city of Ephesus. He was exiled under Emperor Domitian to the island Patmos. It was there that he wrote the Book of Revelation, which is the 27th book of the New Testament. Under Nerva, John returned to Ephesus, and there composed the Gospel of John, the 4th book of the New Testament, and three Epistles, called John 1, John 2, John 3. Since the gospel of John is not thought to have been written before 90 A. D., John would have died a very old man. His tomb is prominently displayed today near the ancient city of Ephesus.

 

The most compelling reason, however, for accepting the general validity of the gospel stories concerning Jesus’ death and resurrection is not to question whether or not the gospel writers were eye-witnesses to these events but rather to recall briefly the stories told in the gospels about Jesus before Easter Sunday – i.e., the nature of the pre-Easter Jesus that prefigured the post-Easter Jesus.  Therein Jesus is described as a man who could not only heal the infirm and sick, restore the sight to the blind, who on two occasions fed crowds of 4 to5 thousand people with a few loaves of bread and pieces of fish, and who changed water into wine, but also a man who could walk on water, still the winds and the waves on the Sea of Galilee, and who on more than one occasion would simply disappear when the Jewish authorities tried to seize him.  To describe “What Manner of Man is This” who could do all these things Marcus Borg – one of the Jesus Seminar scholars – simply says that “The most crucial fact about Jesus was that he was a spirit person, a mediator of the sacred; one of those persons in human history to whom the Spirit was an experiential reality.”[14]  In his footnote to this quotation he further explains that “In Christian terms, Spirit is synonymous with God, so long as God is understood as an experiential reality and not as a distant being.”[15]  In other words although God is a transcendent being, he is also immanent not only within Jesus but within all of his creation.  Borg uses the word  panentheism to emphasize this dual nature. Jesus talks about his “Father which art in Heaven” and then tells us about his immanence by announcing that “the kingdom of heaven is within you” (Luke 17:21)  Likewise St. Paul tells his Athenian listeners that God “is not far from each one of us. For in him we live and move and have our being.” (Acts 17:28).  Likewise St. Paul tells his Athenian listeners that God “is not far from each one of us. For in him we live and move and have our being.” (Acts 17:28).  Paul also acknowledges the risen Christ’s closeness to God in his letter to the Galatians when he tells them: “I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who lives but Christ who lives in me.” (2:20).

 

            Dr. Borg goes on to explain that Judaism has had a long history of people who were spirit persons: “Abraham and Jacob had visions of God and other paranormal experiences.”[16]  Many of their prophets like Isaiah and Elijah were also inspired by the Spirit of God. “Closer to the time of Jesus there were a number of Jewish holy men or spirit persons.  Best known are Honi, the Circle Drawer, and Hanina ben Dosa, both of whom were famed for their contemplative prayer and their ability as ‘miracle workers’.”[17]  There are also instances in the Old Testament of men being taken up into heaven without tasting death.  For example, when Enoch was 365 years old, he “walked with God; then he was no more, because God took him.” (Genesis 5:24), and the prophet Elijah was taken up to heaven by a whirlwind in the presence of Elisha. (2nd Kings 2:11) These though were stories of ascensions rather than of resurrections after a physical death.  There have been many reports of people being restored to life after their physical death.  Jesus not only restored his friend, Lazarus, to life after he had been laid in his tomb for four days, but he also brought the daughter of Jairus back to life shortly after her death, and even a young man in the midst of his own funeral procession. Similarly, the apostle Peter restored a woman named Dorcas to life after she had died and St. Paul restored a man named Eutychus who had fallen asleep and had fallen to his death from a window, according to the book of Acts.  Even in the 20th century an American evangelical missionary, David L. Hogan, claims to have witnessed 28 resurrections from the dead and his ministers reportedly have resurrected approximately 400 people.[18] All of those referenced above, however, were restored to life in their current physical bodies and died, or will eventually die, a natural death.

            The resurrection of Jesus, on the other hand, was of an entirely different character.  When Mary Magdalene stood weeping outside the empty tomb Sunday morning, a man she assumed to be the gardener said to her: “Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you looking for?” and “she said to him, “Sir, if you have taken him away, tell me where you have laid him, and I will take him away.”  Then Jesus said to her, “Mary!” She turned to him and said to him in Hebrew, “Rabbouni!” (which means Teacher).  Jesus said to her, “Do not hold on to me, because I have not yet ascended to the Father.  But go to my brothers and say to them, “I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.” (John 20:15-18).  Edgar Cayce explains this further in one of his readings: “The body that was seen by the normal or carnal eye of Mary was such that it could not be handled until there had been the conscious union with the sources of all power, of all force.  But afterward – when there had been the second, the third, the fourth and even the sixth meeting – he then said [to Thomas] ‘Put forth thy hand and touch the nail prints in my hands, in my feet.  Thrust thy hand into my side and believe.’ This indicated the transformation.  For as indicated, when the soul departs from the body (this is not being spoken of the Christ,  you see),it has all the form of the body from which it has past, yet it is not visible to the carnal mind unless that mind has been, and is, attuned to the infinite.  Then it appears, in the infinite, as that which may be handled, with the appetites, until these have been accorded to a unit of activity with universal consciousness.  Just as it was with the Christ body, ‘Children do you have anything here to eat?’ This indicated to the disciples and the apostles present that this was not transmutation but regeneration, recreation of the atoms and cells of the body that might, through desire, masticate material things; hence fish and honey were given.”[19] Sometimes this regenerated body is called the “glorified body”.

             St. Paul explains the difference between the mortal and the immortal body when he speaks of our death and resurrection to the church at Corinth:

            What you so does not come to life unless it dies. . . So it is with the resurrection of the dead.  What is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable.  It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory.  It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power.  It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body.  If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual body. Thus it is written, “The first man, Adam, became a living being; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit.  But it is not the spiritual that is first, but the physical, and then the spiritual.  The first man was from the earth, a man of dust; the second man is from heaven . . . Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we will also bear the image of the man of heaven.”[20]

            When the two men who the Lord met and talked with him on their walk to Emmaus returned to Jerusalem, they found the eleven disciples and their companions gathered together.  “They told what had happened on the road, and how he had been made known to them in the breaking of the bread.  While they were talking about this, Jesus himself stood among them and said to them ‘Peace be with you’. They were startled and terrified, and thought they were seeing a ghost.  He said to them, ‘Why are you frightened, and why do doubts arise in your hearts?  Look at my hands and my feet; see that it is I myself. Touch me and see; for a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.’  And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and his feet.  While in their joy they were disbelieving and still wondering, he said to them, ‘Have you anything here to eat?’  They gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate it in their presence. Then he said to them, ‘These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you – that everything written about me in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms must be fulfilled.  Thus it is written, that the Messiah is to suffer and to rise from the dead on the third day, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins is to be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem.  You are witnesses of these things.  And see, I am sending upon you what my Father promised; to stay here in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.’  Then he led them out as far as Bethany, and, lifting up his hands, he blessed them.  While he was blessing them, he withdrew from them and was carried up into heaven.” [21]

The Post-Easter Jesus – The Early Church

            At their last supper together Jesus told his disciples that to fulfill the prophesies it was necessary for him to leave them and return to his Father’s house: “Because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts.  Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Advocate will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you.” (John 16: 4-7)  “When the Advocate comes, whom I will send you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who comes from the Father, he will testify on my behalf.  You are also to testify because you have been with me from the beginning.” (John 15:26-27).  As Jesus told his disciples at his ascension to “stay in the city until you have been clothed from power from on high”, they returned to Jerusalem as he had requested.  Ten days following the ascension (fifty days after his resurrection) they were assembled in an upstairs room together with his mother, Mary, other women, his brothers and other believers numbering about 120 in total when: “Suddenly from heaven came a sound like the rush of violent wind, and it filled the entire house where they were sitting.  Divided tongues, as of fire, appeared among them, and a tongue rested on each of them.  All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other languages as the Spirit gave them ability.” (Acts 2: 2-4).

            “Now there were devout Jews from every nation under heaven living in Jerusalem.  And at this sound the crowd gathered and was bewildered, because each one heard them speaking in the native language of each. . . All were amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, ‘What does this mean?’  But others sneered and said, ‘They are filled with new wine.’  But Peter standing with the eleven, raised his voice and addressed them, ‘Men of Judea and all who live in Jerusalem, let this be known to you and listen to what I say.  Indeed, these are not drunk, as you suppose, for it is only nine o’clock in the morning. . . You that are Israelites, listen to what I have to say:  Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with deeds of power, wonders, and signs that God did through him among you, as you yourselves know – this man, handed over to you according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of those outside the law.  But God raised him up, having freed him from death, because it was impossible for him to be held in its power. . . This Jesus God raised up, and of that all of us are witnesses.  Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this that you both see and hear. . . Therefore let the entire house of Israel know with certainty that God has made him both Lord and Messiah, this Jesus whom you crucified.’  Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and to the other apostles, ‘Brothers, what should we do?’  Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.  For the promise is for you, for your children, and for all who are far away, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to him.’ . . . So those who welcomed his message were baptized, and that day about three thousand persons were added.  They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.”[22]

             Following the bestowing of the Holy Spirit on the apostles and the rest of the 120 present in the upper room in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost it should be noted that nearly all others, who shortly thereafter were baptized in the name of Jesus and received the gift of the Holy Spirit, were Jews.  Even all of the original twelve apostles were Jews.  Likewise, before Jesus was crucified he sent out the twelve apostles two-by-twos and instructed them: ‘Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel’ (Matthew 10:5-6) Thus these early, largely Jewish, followers of Jesus continued the practice of circumcision of newly born male children, the observance of the laws prescribed by the Torah and the observance of the Passover and other feasts required of all Jews.  Nevertheless, the behavior of some of them continued to upset some of the Sadducees and priests in the temple.  For example, one day when the apostles Peter and John were going up to the temple at the hour of prayer, they observed a man lame from birth being carried to the temple gate so that he could ask for alms from those entering the temple. When he saw Peter and John about to go in the temple, he asked them for alms.  “But Peter said, ‘I have no silver or gold, but what I have I give you; in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, stand up and walk  And he took him by the right hand and raised him up.; and immediately his feet and ankles were made strong.  Jumping up, he stood and began to walk, and he entered the temple with them, walking and leaping and praising god.  . While Peter and John were speaking with the people [who witnessed his instant healing] the priests, the captain of the temple, and the Sadducees came to them, much annoyed because they were teaching the people and proclaiming that in Jesus there is resurrection of the dead.  So they arrested them and put them in custody until the next the next day, for it was already evening.  But many of those who heard the word believed; and they numbered about five thousand.”[23]

            It soon became apparent simply because of the numbers of those who had been baptized in the name of Jesus and who lived in Jerusalem that the apostles needed additional help.  So they chose seven from among the seventy who had also been sent out, like the twelve apostles, two-by-twos, to whom they gave the name of deacons to assist them in Jerusalem.  Their names were Stephen, Philip, the Evangelist, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas and Nicolas.  Stephen was also recognized for his gifts as an evangelist who preached the teachings of Jesus not only to the people of Jerusalem but also to members of the outlying Hellenistic synagogues.  Not only was he eloquent in speech but  he “did great wonders and signs among the people.  Then some of those who belonged to the synagogue of the Freedmen, Cyrenians, Alexandrians, and others from Cilicia and Asia, stood up and argued with Stephen.  But they could not withstand the wisdom and the Spirit with which he spoke. Then they secretly instigated some men to say, ‘We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses and God’  They stirred up the people as well as the elders and scribes; then they suddenly confronted him, seized him; and brought him before the council”(Acts 6:8-12).In his defense he accused them saying: “ You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you are forever opposing the Holy Spirit, just as your ancestors used to do.  Which one of the Prophets did your fathers not persecute, and they killed the ones who prophesied the coming of the Just One, of whom now, too, you have become betrayers and murderers. You are the ones who received the law as ordained by angels, and yet you have not kept it.’  When they heard these things, they became enraged at Stephen.  . Then they dragged him out of the city and began to stone him; and the witnesses laid their coats at the feet of a young man named Saul.  While they were stoning Stephen, he prayed, ‘Lord Jesus, receive my spirit., Then he knelt down and cried out in a loud voice, ‘Lord, do not hold this sin against them.’  When he had said this, he died.  And Saul approved of their killing him.” (Acts 7:51-60 passim and 8:1) [The stoning and martyrdom of Stephen occurred circa 34 A. D.]

            Not long afterward  “Saul, still breathing threats and murders against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues at Damascus so that if he found any who belonged to the Way, men or women,  he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.  Now as he was going along and approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him.  He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’  He asked, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ The reply came, ‘I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.  But get up and enter the city and you will be told what to do.’  Saul got up from the ground, and though his eyes were open, he could see nothing; [the men who were with him] led him by the hand and brought him to Damascus.  For three days he was without sight, and neither ate nor drank.” (Acts 9:1-9)  Then the Lord contacted a disciple in Damascus by the name of Ananias and instructed him where to find Saul and lay his hands on him that he might regain his sight.  “But Ananias answered, ‘Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much evil he has done to your saints in Jerusalem; and here he has the authority from the chief priests to bind all who invoke your name.’  But the Lord said to him, ‘Go, for he is an instrument whom I have chosen to bring my name before the Gentiles and kings and before the people of Israel; I myself will show him how much he must suffer for the sake of my name.’ So Ananias went and entered the house.  He laid his hands on Saul and said, ‘Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on your way here, has sent me to you that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’ And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and his sight was restored.  Then he got up and was baptized, and after taking some food, he regained his strength.” (Acts 9: 13-19).  Thus began the career of the man who unquestionly had more influence on the spread of early Christianity than any other man.  This dramatic change from an ardent opponent of the followers of Jesus to one of its most eloquent and inspirational leaders is known to history as the conversion of St. Paul. (Saul was his Jewish name and Paulus was his Roman name.)

            Following his stay in Damascus after his conversion and baptism Paul first went to Arabia and then came back to Damascus (Galatians 1:17). According to Acts, his preaching in the local synagogues got him into trouble there, and he was forced to escape, being let down over the wall in a basket (Acts 9:23). Then three years after his conversion he went to Jerusalem where he met James, the Lord’s brother, and stayed with Simon Peter for fifteen days (Galatians 1:13–24). According to Acts he then apparently attempted to join the disciples and was accepted only owing to the intercession of Barnabas — they were all understandably afraid of him as one who had been a persecutor of the Church (Acts 9:26–27). Again, according to Acts, he got into trouble for disputing with "Hellenists"    (i.e., Koine speaking Jews) so he was sent back to Tarsus.  Meanwhile, in spite of Paul’s charge by the risen Christ to “bring his word before the Gentiles” the mission to the non-Jewish world actually begins with Phillip, one of the newly chosen deacons, who went to the city of Samaria and proclaimed the Messiah and the good news of the kingdom to the people there.  Those who believed what he said, both men and women, were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.  “Now when the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them [and] they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit.  Now after Peter and John had testified and spoken the word of the Lord, they returned to Jerusalem, proclaiming the good news to many villages of the Samaritans.” (Acts 8:14-25 passim)

            Next Peter was called in the Spirit to contact a man named Cornelius who lived in Caeserea, not far from Damascus in Syria.  Cornelius in turn had a vision to contact a certain Simon who was called Peter who at the moment was lodging with Simon, a tanner, whose house was by the seaside in Joppa. So he then sent two of his slaves there to tell Peter that their master “was directed by a holy angel to send for you to come to his house and to hear what you had to say. So Peter invited them in and gave them lodging.” (Acts 10:22-23).  The next day in accordance with his vision Peter and some of the believers at Joppa  set out for Caesarea to meet with Cornelius. Upon his arrival he “found that many had been assembled; and he said to them, ‘You yourselves know that it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or to visit a Gentile; but God [in a vision] has shown me that I should not call anyone profane or unclean.  So when I was sent for, I came without objection.” (Acts 10:27-29).  Peter then proceeded to tell them about the life of Jesus of Nazareth, how he was put to death by crucifixion, but rose again on the third day and appeared “not to all people but to us who were chosen by God as witnesses, and who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead.  He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one ordained by God as judge of the living and the dead.  All the prophets testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.  While Peter was still speaking, the Holy Spirit fell upon all who heard the word.  The circumsised believers who had come with Peter were astounded that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on the Gentiles, for they heard them speaking in tongues and extolling God.  Then Peter said, ‘Can anyone withhold the water for baptizing these people who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?’ So he ordered them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.  Then they invited him to stay for several days.” (Acts 10: 41-48).

                “Now those [Jews] who were scattered because of the persecution that took place over Stephen traveled as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch, and they spoke the word to no one except Jews.  But among them were some men of Cyprus and Cyrene who, on coming to Antioch, spoke also to the Hellenists [i.e., Greek speaking Gentiles], proclaiming the Lord Jesus. News of this came to the ears of the church in Jerusalem and they sent Barnabas to Antioch.  And a great many people were brought to the Lord.  Then Barnabas went to Tarsus to look for Saul, and when he had found him, brought him to Antioch.  So it was that for an entire year they met with the church and taught a great many people, and it was in Antioch[24] that the disciples were first called ‘Christians’.” (Acts 11: 19-26 passim).  During their stay in Antioch a prophet came from Jerusalem named Agabus who predicted by the Spirit there would be a severe famine all over the world.  This actually occurred in Judea circa 45-46 A D.  The apostles and disciples in Jerusalem determined that according to their ability each would send relief to the believers living in Judea.  So Barnabus and Saul collected money from their followers in Antioch and brought it to them at Jerusalem. When they returned to Antioch they met with others in the church there including Simeon, who was called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, the companion of Luke who actually wrote both the gospels of Luke and Acts, and Manaen, a member of the court of Herod the ruler. “While they were worshipping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for me Barnabus and Saul for the work to which I have called them’. Then after fasting and praying they laid their hands on them and sent them off.” (Acts 13: 1-3).  Thus began the first of three of Saul’s (i.e., Paul’s) missionary journeys during which he and Barnabus visited the island of Cypress, then Pamphylia, Pisidia, and Lycaonia, Lystra and Derbe, all in Asia Minor, and after establishing many churches they returned to the church in Antioch and “related all that God had done with them, and how he had opened a door of faith for the Gentiles.” (Acts 14: 27).

            “Then certain individuals came down from Judea and were teaching the brothers, ‘Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved,’ and after Paul and Barnabus had no small dissention and debate with them they and some of the others were appointed to go up to Jerusalem to discuss this question with the apostles and the elders.  When they came to Jerusalem, they were welcomed by the church and the apostles and the elders, and they reported all that God had done with them.  But some believers who belonged to the sect of the Pharisees stood up and said, ‘It is necessary for them to be circumcised and ordered to keep the law of Moses.’  After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, ‘My brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that I should be the one through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the good news and become believers.  And God, who knows the human heart, testified to them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as he did for us; and in cleansing their hearts by faith he has made no distinction between them and us.  Now therefore why are you putting God to the test by placing on the neck of the disciples a yoke that neither our ancestors nor we have been able to bear? On the contrary, we believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will’ The whole assembly kept silence, and listened to Barnabus and Paul as they told of all the signs and wonders that God had done through them among the Gentiles.  After they finished speaking, James [the leader of the church in Jerusalem and the brother of the Lord] replied, ‘My brothers, listen to me.  Peter has related how God first looked favorably on the Gentiles, to take from among them a people for his name.  This agrees with the words of the prophets. Therefore I have reached the decision that we should not trouble those Gentiles who are turning to God, but we should write to them to abstain only from things polluted by idols and from fornication and from whatever has been strangled and from blood.  For in every city, for generations past, Moses has had those who proclaim him, for he has been read aloud every Sabbath in the synagogues.’” (Acts 15: 1-21 passim).  This meeting known as the Council of Jerusalem occurred circa 50 A D.

                 Shortly thereafter Barnabus and Paul accompanied by Silas and Judas who were chosen by the apostles and the elders to deliver their findings orally and by letter to the church at Antioch.  When they gathered the congregation together they delivered the letter.  When the members read it they rejoiced and Silas and Judas also said much to encourage and strengthen the believers.  At some point then after the Apostolic Council of Jerusalem Paul, accompanied by Silas and later also by Timothy and Luke, made his second missionary journey, first revisiting the churches previously established by him in Asia Minor, and then passing through Galatia. At Troas a vision of a Macedonian was had by Paul, which impressed him as a call from God to evangelize in Macedonia. He accordingly sailed for Europe, and preached the Gospel in Philippi. Thessalonica, Beroea, Athens, and Corinth where he settled for three years. Then he returned to Antioch by way of Ephesus and Jerusalem. The second missionary journey was circa 51-54 A D.

            Following this hearing, Paul continued his preaching, usually called his "third missionary journey" (Acts 18:23–21:26), traveling again through Asia Minor and Macedonia, to Antioch and back. He caused a great uproar in the theatre in Ephesus, where local silversmiths feared loss of income due to Paul's activities. Their income relied on the sale of silver statues (idols) of the goddess Artemis, whom they worshipped; the resulting mob almost killed Paul (Acts 19:21–41) and his companions. Later, as Paul was passing near Ephesus on his way to Jerusalem, Paul chose not to stop, since he was in haste to reach Jerusalem by Pentecost.[41] The church here, however, was so highly regarded by Paul that he called the elders to Miletus to meet with him (Acts 20:16–38). When they came to him, he said to them: ‘As a captive to the Spirit, I am on my way to Jerusalem, not knowing what will happen to me there, except that the Holy Spirit testifies to me in every city that imprisonment and persecutions are waiting for me.  But I do not count my life of any value to myself, if only I may finish my course and the ministry that I have received from the Lord Jesus, to testify to the good news of God’s grace. . . When he had finished speaking, he knelt down with them all and prayed.  There was much weeping among them all; they embraced Paul and kissed him [knowing] that they would not see him again.” (Acts 20:17-38 passim),  From Miletus he sailed to Syria and landed at Tyre. From there he went briefly to Ptolemais and then on to Caesarea where the prophet Agabus predicts Paul’s imprisonment soon after entering Jerusalem.   This third missionary journey was circa 54-57 A D,

Upon his arrival in Jerusalem, the Apostle Paul provided a detailed account to James and the Elders regarding his ministry among the Gentiles and they praised God for the report which they received. Afterward the elders informed him of rumors that had been circulating, which stated that he was teaching Jews to forsake observance of the Mosaic law and the customs of the Jews, including circumcision. To rebut these rumors, the elders asked Paul to join with four other men in performing the vow of purification according to Mosaic law, in order to disprove the accusations of the Jews. Paul agreed, and proceeded to perform the vow.  He then laid plans for another missionary journey, intending to leave Jerusalem for Rome and Spain. However Paul was accused of a serious violation of temple rules by Jews from Asia while in Jerusalem that hindered him from accomplishing his purpose. ”They seized him, shouting, ‘This is the man who is teaching everyone everywhere against our people, our law, and this place; more than that, he has actually brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled this holy place.’ For they had previously seen Trophimus the Ephesian with him in the city, and they supposed that Paul had brought him into the temple.” (Acts 21:27-29). If he had been found guilty of the charges, the sentence would have been the death penalty.  The Jews were on the verge of killing him when Roman soldiers intervened.  When they discovered that Paul was a citizen of Rome they sent him to Felix, the governor at Caesarea to hear the charges against him.  Paul claimed his right as a Roman citizen to be tried in Rome, but as a result of the inaction by Felix, Paul spent the next two years in confinement in Caesarea.  When a new governor, Porcius Festus, took office Paul was sent by sea to Rome, being shipwrecked in Malta on the way.  It is believed that he continued his journey by sea to Sicily before eventually reaching Rome.  According to Acts 28:30-31 Paul spent another two years in Rome under house arrest where he continued to preach the gospel of Jesus the Christ.  Whether or not he then made it to Spain as he had hoped is not known. The Acts of the Apostles gives us no information about it. If he went to Spain he probably was executed in Rome upon his return in 64 A D.  Otherwise his execution by the Emperor Nero was probably in 62 A D at the end of his second year of imprisonment there.

 

St. Paul’s untiring interest in and paternal affection for the churches established by him has been named as the author of thirteen canonical Epistles. However it is probable that the two letters to Timothy and the one to Titus were not written by Paul since they are believed to have been written as late as 125 A D although it is quite certain that he wrote other letters which are no longer extant. In his Epistles St. Paul shows himself to be a profound religious thinker and he has had an enduring formative influence in the development of Christianity. The centuries only make more apparent his greatness of mind and spirit.  Both St. Augustine and Martin Luther, to cite only two well-known Christian theologians, credited St. Paul with shaping their own thinking.[25]

 

Not only was St. Paul executed under Nero but traditionally the Apostle Peter was also sentenced to death by crucifixion during Nero’s reign and was buried on the spot where the Basilica of St. Peter now stands in Vatican City. Consequently, a number of churches today are dedicated to both St. Peter and St. Paul (e.g., the cathedral of St. Peter and St. Paul in St. Petersburg, Russia and the churches in Wilmington outside of Los Angeles and in Winter Park, Florida.)  Not only Christian church leaders but all Christians living in Rome or areas controlled by Rome before the edict of Milan in 313 A D were in danger not only of being arrested but of being killed in the coliseum by lions or gladiators to entertain the populace. This was the result of part of Rome being burned down in 64 A D so the Emperor Nero blamed the Christians and the people turned on them.  Arrests and executions followed.  To identify places where Christians were meeting it was common to place on the sides of walls and houses the crude outline of a fish. To the populous these signs would probably seem to be innocuous graffiti since these were mostly seaport towns where fishing was a way of life. The heads of the drawing would point toward the places where they held their meeting in catacombs or in the back rooms of shops and homes.  Also at that time the same symbol was used by Greeks to mark the location of a funeral so it would not have appeared to be an unusual symbol. The Greek word for fish transliterated into English was ichthys, the first three Greek letters of which were iota, chi and theta which began the Greek words for Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior. Even today the symbol of the fish continues to be displayed on signs and bumper stickers to indicate a place of Christian worship or one who is a Christian. 

Followers of astrology are fond of pointing out that the sign of Pisces (meaning “fish”) is also used to designate the era beginning with the birth of Jesus in roughly 1 A D and being succeeded around the year 2,000 by the age of Aquarius (which is the sign in the zodiac following Pisces due to the precession of the equinox in a counter-clockwise direction.)  The sign preceding Pisces was Aries, the Ram, which symbolized the lamb whose blood was smeared over the doorpost and lintels of all Jews the night before their exodus across the Red Sea in order for God to “pass over” their homes while slaughtering first born children in all other houses in Egypt.

Even some of the Christian apostles remaining in Israel were also martyred.  The apostle James, the son of Zebedee was the first of the apostles to suffer martyrdom when after being falsely accused of crimes he was beheaded by order of Herod Agrippi I in 44 A D. It has been said that when the apostle James was led out to die, a man who had brought false accusations against him walked with him to the place of execution. He had doubtless expected to see James looking pale and frightened but he saw him, instead, bright and joyous, like a conqueror who had won a great battle. The false witness greatly wondered at this and became convinced that the Savior in whom the prisoner by his side believed must be the true God or He could not impart such cheerfulness and courage to a man about to die. The man himself, therefore, became a convert to Christianity and was condemned to die with James.  Consequently, both were beheaded on the same day and with the same sword. His brother was the apostle John and their mother, Salome, is believed to have been the sister of Jesus’ mother, Mary. So James and John were first cousins of the Lord. About the same period two of the seven deacons chosen to assist the disciples in Jerusalem were also martyred – Timon at Corinth and Parmenas at Philippi in Macedonia.

 

Even some of the Christian apostles remaining in Israel were also martyred.  The apostle James, the son of Zebedee was the first of the apostles to suffer martyrdom when after being falsely accused of crimes he was beheaded by order of Herod Agrippi I in 44 A D. It has been said that when the apostle James was led out to die, a man who had brought false accusations against him walked with him to the place of execution. He had doubtless expected to see James looking pale and frightened but he saw him, instead, bright and joyous, like a conqueror who had won a great battle. The false witness greatly wondered at this and became convinced that the Savior in whom the prisoner by his side believed must be the true God or He could not impart such cheerfulness and courage to a man about to die. The man himself, therefore, became a convert to Christianity and was condemned to die with James.  Consequently, both were beheaded on the same day and with the same sword. His brother was the apostle John and their mother, Salome, is believed to have been the sister of Jesus’ mother, Mary. So James and John were first cousins of the Lord. About the same period two of the seven deacons chosen to assist the disciples in Jerusalem were also martyred – Timon at Corinth and Parmenas at Philippi in Macedonia.

 

Later another one of the apostles, James, the Lesser, was put to death in 62 A D by the high priest Annas, the son of the Annas who had presided at the trial of Jesus.  Judea was still ruled directly by Rome.  However, “when the Roman governor named Festus died and his replacement Albinus was on his way from Rome, Annas took advantage of the opportunity and had James arrested and brought before the Sanhedrin, which he and his henchmen controlled.  He charged James and some others, presumably Nazarenes, with transgressing the Jewish law and delivered them to be stoned.”[26] James the Lesser, also known as James the Just, was not only the head of the church in Jerusalem but his preeminence among the apostles is also attested by Jesus himself in the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas discovered at Nag Hammadi in 1945:  “The disciples said to Jesus, ‘We know you will leave us.  Who is going to be our leader then?’ Jesus said to them, ‘No matter where you go you are to go to James the Just, for whose sake heaven and earth came into being.’ “[27]  Tradition has always recognized him as the author of the Epistle in the New Testament that bears his name.  Though generally not accepted by most historians, James Tabor argues persuasively that James, the Lesser was the brother of Jesus.  He further notes that both early historians Eusebius and Epiphanius name the apostles Simon and Judas as successors of  James the Just as heads of the church in Jerusalem, and he makes the case that both of these successors were also brothers of Jesus.[28]  Scripture supports this family relationship when Jesus was teaching in the synagogue in his own home area, “Many who heard him were astonished, saying, ‘Where did this man get all this?  What is the wisdom given to him? What mighty works are wrought by his hands! Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary and the brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon, and are not his sisters here with us?’ “[29]

 

Great Revolt that began as a result of Greeks sacrificing birds in front of a local synagogue in Caesarea.  In an act of defiance against Rome the son of the high priest ceased prayers and sacrifices for the Roman Emperor in the temple at Jerusalem.  The Emperor retaliated and fighting continued between Roman forces and Jewish resistance, led by a sect called zelotes or Zealots, until Roman legions under Titus besieged and destroyed Jerusalem, looted and burned Herod’s Temple in 70 A D and enslaved or massacred a large part of the Jewish population. At the beginning of the conflict a group of Zealots, called the Sicarii for the small daggers they concealed under their cloaks, captured from a Roman garrison a site of ancient palaces and fortifications  called Masada located on top of an isolated rock plateau on the eastern edge of the Judean desert overlooking the Dead sea.  Shortly before the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple other Sicarii and their families joined those already living at Masada.  After two years of failing to breach the walls of the fortress the Roman soldiers constructed a 375 foot assault ramp to reach the Masada defenses.  When they finally entered the fortress in the spring of 73 A D, however, the Romans discovered that its 936 inhabitants had set all the buildings but the food storerooms ablaze and committed mass suicide rather than face certain capture, defeat, slavery or execution by their enemies.[30]

 

The historians “Eusebius and Epiphanius preserved a tradition that the Jerusalem followers of Jesus, now led by Simon son of Clophas [the brother of James the Lesser] fled the city of Jerusalem just before siege in response to an ‘oracle given by revelation before the war.’ ”[31] “Josephus reports that refugees fled the advancing Roman armies in all directions.  This is the period when the Essene settlement at Qumran was abandoned and the Dead Sea Scrolls were hidden in the surrounding caves.”[32] Since the Essenes are never mentioned as an existing group after this period, it remains a mystery as to what became of them.  Martin Larson believes he knows the answer: “The only reasonable hypothesis seems to be that they came over to Christianity, either as individuals or in groups, some of them before, and many more soon after, the destruction of Jerusalem.  We believe that they originated what is known as the Ebionite communion. . . [This] movement was an important segment of early Christianity; and it continued for centuries. The name signifies the poor; and it was from the beginning distinctly Judaistic and bears every characteristic of Essene origin.  Irenaeus declares: ‘Those who are called Ebionites . . . .use the gospel according to Matthew only, and repudiate the Apostle Paul, maintaining that he was an apostate from the law . . . they practice circumcision, persevere in the observance of those customs which are enjoined by the law, and are so Judaic in their style of life, that they even adore Jerusalem as if it were the house of God.’“[33]

 

The churches established in Europe and Asia-Minor by Paul and his various companions were largely unaffected by the catastrophic events that occurred to

the Jews in Jerusalem and Judea following the Great Revolt of 66-70 A D.  However this did not prevent later second century writers in Europe like Iranaeus, bishop of Lugdunum in Gaul (now Lyons, France), from casting aspersions on the Ebionites and other groups who departed from the early development of Christian theology.   As the first great Catholic theologian, Iraneus emphasized the traditional elements in the Church, especially the episcopate, Scripture, and tradition. He wrote that the only way for Christians to retain unity was to humbly accept one doctrinal authority--episcopal councils. In his best known book, Adversus Haereses (Against Heresies) written in 180 A D, Iranaeus condemned the Ebionites as heretics: “Not only do they circumcise and keep Torah; they also insist that Jesus, though indeed the crucified and risen Messiah, was solely and normally human.  The Word sown on more Hellenistic soil produced a different Christology.  These other Christians proclaimed that Christ had never been human at all.  In Christ the divine cams as close as it ever possibly could to the human; but these two principles remained fundamentally separate.  Such Christology, called Docetism (from the Greek dokein meaning to appear) was a coherent expression of Hellenism’s deep-seated ambivaslence toward material reality”