THE NATURE OF REALITY (PART I)

 

An Essay by John W. Hawkins

 

 

 

Reality: "that which is absolute or self-existent, as opposed to what is  derivative or dependent; that which is ultimate."

                                       (Webster's Collegiate Dictionary)

 

 

    Why I have always been drawn to think about the unknowable and higher order of abstract ideas, I am at a loss to explain.  I certainly am not a philosopher nor have I had a direct message from Heaven which has given me knowledge not available to other of my fellow mortals. Nonetheless, as long as I can remember, I have been attracted to the unsolved mysteries of the universe, the nature of being, where we  came from and where we are going.  I have not spent years studying these questions nor years in daily meditation on them, but having reached a stage in my life which permits more time for reflection and contemplation, old, nagging questions push their way more easily into the conscious mind and demand to be addressed.

 

    My mother refreshed my early childhood memories of my always wanting to go to India to seek the wisdom from one of the wise men reputedly living there.  ( A guru for a 4 or 5 year old is pretty unusual stuff to be thinking about you must admit.  However, I was once told by a psychic that in a recent incarnation I had been a Hindu.)

 

    When I was eight or nine, I remember sending off for and receiving information about the Rosicrucians (The Knights of the Rosy Cross).  I certainly was not encouraged in any way on these interests by either my parents or my teachers.  It was just one of those things that makes each one of us a unique creation with different aptitudes, interests, likes, dislikes, etc.

 

    A few years later I became interested in magic and almost all of my limited funds were spent at the local magic shop buying the latest trick or books on magic. Later, when our children were small, I would perform some of these parlor tricks at birthday parties.  Even to this day I am fascinated by magicians and the effects they are able to produce, even though I know they are all illusions.

 

    My religious upbringing was very conventional.  If I had not been somewhat precocious and hard for Sunday School teachers to handle, I probably would have been raised a Baptist or a Presbyterian since my parents occasionally attended one or the other of these churches. However, the teacher that finally was able to control me

was an Episcopalian, and so I was baptized and confirmed in that church instead of one of those I had been ejected from.  (I even became an acolyte who assisted the minister in the communion ceremony and got a few gold stars for Sunday School attendence.)

 

    Although there was much about what I was taught that I didn't fully understand or believe (e.g. that the world was created in six days), religion was a fascinating subject to me.  While I was in the U.S. Navy during World War II, a Lutheran chaplain took me under his wing and had me seriously considering studying for the ministry when I

got out of the service.  Since I had already completed three semesters at M.I.T., I decided to complete my undergraduate work there before embarking on a radically different course.  (I returned to M.I.T. in the Fall of 1946.  However, I switched my major from Aeronautical Engineering to Business and Engineering Administration with emphasis on courses in Economics and Psychology.)

 

    My Grandmother Eakins (my Mother's Mother) had a great influence on my religious feelings and beliefs as a boy. 

Although she was not well-educated, she was truly a "good old soul".  Every day of her life, that I knew about at least, she read the bible.  Even when her eyes began to fail her, she used a magnifying glass and would read scriptures aloud to me from her precious book.  Every word in it was God's truth as far as she was concerned.

 

    When I was thirty-two, my father died, and suddenly not only was I a father and a husband but also executor of my father's will and trustee of a modest amount of money which would be mine upon my mother's death.  Therefore, I

was able to have a liberal education in investing money while still "wet behind the ears".  I also immediately became my mother's sole financial advisor and conservatively invested her funds for maximum safety and moderate yield.  This provided her with an adequate income so that in the twenty-two years between my father's death and her own she did not have to withdraw anything from principal in spite of setting up generous trust funds for

each of my four children.

 

    Four years later a series of events conspired to bring me to a "Cosmic Consciousness" experience. (I was 36 – a typical age according to Dr. Bucke's book having this title.)  In those days we spent our vacations in a rented beach house on the Gulf Coast.  About one week prior to our annual trek I was parking my car downtown at a parking meter, but I found no change in my pocket.  The store in front of the parking place was a book store.  So even though my destination was around the corner, I went inside to get a dime in change to feed the meter.  (In those days you could park an hour for a dime.)

 

    The clerk was busy with a customer so I looked at a book rack while I waited for her to complete the transaction at the cash register.  My eye fell on a book that had a picture of a spiral galaxy on it entitled: "The Unobstructed Universe" by Stewart White.  Since I had always been interested in astronomy (My father at one time was President of the Tulsa Astronomical Society.), I decided to buy the book to read during the upcoming

vacation rather than just asking the clerk to make change for me.  So in the suitcase went the book which led me to a life-changing experience.

 

    It turned out that the book was not about astronomy at all as the cover had suggested, but rather about the wife of the author.  She was a psychic who had recently died and who managed to contact a friend of hers who was also a psychic.  The very first chapter described how Betty White had lured her friend into a store to buy something which

would lead her to make contact.  A light began to go off in my head.  Do you suppose it was possible that my father (definitely not a believer in things psychic) had contrived to bring me into that bookstore with no intention of buying any book, much less that particular book, and had somehow influenced me to purchase it similar to Betty White's friend's experience?  After the "Eureka" experience while reading the book I was convinced that someone or something had definitely conspired to have me purchase and read that particular book.

 

    It was not a deeply philosophical book, but rather the story of contact with "the other side" and what life was like after "death".  The point in the book when I had what Pierre Janet calls an "abaissment du niveau mental" (a lowering of the mental threshhold) was when one of them discarnates was explaining through her friend about the nature of the Trinity.  All at once my mind was flooded with a myriad of images, impressions, and feelings.  There was no flash of light though which often accompanies this sort of thing.  (It was so brillant that Saul was struck blind from his encounter with the risen Christ on the road to Damascus.)

 

    Nevertheless, from that moment on many things concerning life after death, the reality of God and Christ as the Son of God were no longer merely things I had been taught as a child.  They were living, tangible, eternal truths now inseparably a part of me.  They were now part of MY being, MY life, and MY truth as well.  (Conventional Christianity would call this a "conversion" or "born again" experience. Yet the ideas that came to me at that time such as the reality of reincarnation were far from conventional Christian concepts and teachings.)

 

    The sense of joy, exhilaration, and heightened awareness of everything around me was unbelievable.  I felt like telling everyone I met how great it was to be alive and what a thrilling experience I had just had. After we went back home after the vacation I read books like a man possessed (which I guess I was).  It is to my wife's credit that she didn't leave me or try to have me locked up while all of this was going on. Mostly I read

what would be styled "metaphysical books": Eastern philosophy, mystics of all ilks, Edgar Cayce, the Filmores (the founders of the Unity School of Christianity), Blavatsky, Gurdieff, Ouspensky, Plotinus, Plato, Pascal, Carl Jung, etc. etc. etc.  I even joined the Tulsa Theosophical Society (primarily because they had the best metaphysical library in Tulsa). Although everyone saw only part of the elephant (like the "Six Blind Men of

Hindustan"), they were all describing the same magnificient beast - a "Magnificient Obsession" as Lloyd Douglas had titled one of his well-known books.

 

    I thought seriously about quitting my job and expounding this revelation for the benefit of the world at large.  Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed.  I settled for teaching an adult education class at the YMCA on "Realizing Your Potential". (This was 1964, long before the Human Potential movement now in vogue really got going.)  Gradually though, the fires subsided and the realities of providing for a family of six regained their hold.  Nonetheless, as Robert Browning tells us in his poem, "Paracelsus" (named after the famous mystic):

 

"I am a wanderer; I remember well one journey,

How I feared the track was missed,

So long the city I desired to reach lay hid;

When suddenly its spires afar

Flashed through the circling clouds;

(you may conceive my transport.)

Soon the vapors closed again,

But I had seen the city."

 

    More than twenty years have passed since that experience, but the essential realities revealed remain, and will remain, unchanged. ("I had seen the city.") In large measure there was nothing revealed that has not been known by many others for thousands of years for it forms the basis of the world's major religions.  It is truly "The Ancient Wisdom" as Annie Besant titled one of her books on Theosophy.

 

    To acquire this knowledge, however, requires much more than just reading these inspired books (although that is certainly a good way to begin. "Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God ..etc."). As Aldous Huxley puts it: "Knowledge is a function of being.  When there is a change in the being of the knower, there is a

corresponding change in the nature and amount of knowing." ("The Perennial Philosophy" p.vii).  ... Jesus puts the same truth more eloquently when he says: "Except a man be born again he cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven." And "You cannot put new wine in old wineskins." Dr. Bucke in his book, "Cosmic Consciousness" (p.8), describes his own

mystical experience at age 36 as follows:

 

   "Into his brain streamed one momentary flash of the Brahmic Splendor which has ever since lightened his life; upon his heart fell one drop of Brahmic Bliss, leaving for always an after taste of heaven.  Among other things . . he saw and knew that the Cosmos is not dead matter but a living Presence, that the soul of man is immortal, that

the universe is so built and ordered that without any peradventure all things work together for the good of each and all, that the foundation principle of the world is what we call Love and that the happiness of everyone is in the long run absolutely certain.  He claims that he learned more within a few seconds during which the illumination lasted than in previous months or even years of study, and that he learned much that no study could

ever have taught."

 

    The certainty that the universe is filled with Life, and not with little patches of dead matter separated by vast distances of empty space, is at the heart of the mystical experience.  God is! "I AM that I AM" was the name God gave to Moses when he was commissioned by him at the burning bush.  "I have come that you might have Life

and have it overabundantly" and "I am the Way , the Life and the Truth" says Jesus speaking as the Son of the Living God. God's living Spirit underpins and breathes Life into all that exists.  ("Ex -ist" means to stand forth from what "is".)

 

" Every common bush is ablaze with God

        But only he who sees takes off his shoes."

 

                               -  Elizabeth Barrett Browning

 

" The universe is one stupendous whole

     Whose body Nature is and God the soul."

 

-        Alexander Pope

-         

 

    This idea might be thought by some to be nothing but a primitive pantheism (God as Nature, its forces and laws), but it goes far beyond it.  To use a human analogy: Is man nothing but the atoms and chemistry of his body and the laws governing his physiology?  It is obvious to all but the most obdurate materialist that he is more than this.

How much more then must God be than the physical universe. He is actively involved in the whole of the universe and not merely the Creator who has retired from the scene of

His creation. (This is a "Theist" approach rather than a "Deist" one; an approach that believes in a God that is "immanent" as well as "transcendental".)

 

    Are you entirely separated from your physical body? Do you exercise a measure of control over it? Think then of the universe as being totally alive from its center (The Godhead) to its uttermost parts (the physical world of atoms and molecules).  The degrees of freedom (i.e. levels, dimensions, planes, etc. - call them what you will) vary from the densest Matter to pure Spirit, from nearly zero to infinity, but there is nonetheless a

continuum between one extreme and the other. ("His eye is on the sparrow ...")  Not only is there an ever present, living relationship between the Creator and His creation (between what "is" and what "ex-ists"), there are immutable laws governing this relationship.

 

    Perhaps this can best be illustrated by an example from the science of Physics - the study of Physical Laws.  Fifty years ago students of Physics were taught the law of conservation of matter and the law of the conservation of

energy.  The two laws were analogous but separate.  That is to say, matter could neither be created or destroyed, but merely changed into various combinations of atoms and molecules.  Similarly, energy was a constant in the universe and although energy might be redistributed throughout space (e.g. energy radiating from our sun and other stars) the total amount of energy in the universe remained a constant.

 

    Today we know there is an equivalence between matter and energy, and that by applying enough energy matter can be created (i.e. the fusion of matter) while in other cases matter can be converted into energy (e.g. the fission of radioactive uranium in an atomic pile or in an atomic bomb).  This equivalence was stated by Albert Einstein with mathmatical precision by his now famous equation:

 

          E = MC2

 

          Where:    E = Energy, M = Mass, and C = Velocity of Light (a universal constant)

 

          By solving this equation for the constant ,"C":       _______1_________     

                                                       C = \/ E / M

 

which says that in a given system the relationship between the amount of energy, "E", and the amount of mass, "M", is always the same, a  universal constant.

 

    By extension to the metaphysical realm we can postulate that the relationship between the world of spirit (i.e. unseen energy) and the visible world (i.e. matter) is also a constant and that all phenomena result from an interplay between these two realms.  The teachings of the Chinese philosopher, Lao Tsu, taught that this interplay between the worlds of spirit and matter arose from the Tao.  I am sure you are familiar with the modern symbol of the Taoists, which shows a dark half and a white half enclosed in a circle much like two fish chasing each other in perpetual motion.

 

    The dark segment represents the "yin" or earthly forces continually reacting  with the white segment which represents the "yang" or spritual forces in the universe. They consider the "yang" to be male in nature and the "yin" to be female (no doubt because the originators of the system were men). While "yin" and "yang" endlessly circle each other, there is a point in the center of the circle which never moves.  Also in this symbol of the Taoists the lighter half contains a dark speck while the darker half contains a light speck.  This signifies the essential and original unity of the pair in a sexless or hermaphroditic union.  Throughout history the messenger between God and man has been reprsented as both male and female - in other words, an hermaphrodite.  (Remember in

the biblical story of creation how Adam was created in the image of God, a complete being, and then later Eve was fashioned from one of Adam's ribs thus removing the original unity.)

 

    To further strengthen the idea of matter as the female element consider the derivation of the word from its Latin root: "materia".  This is the neuter form of the Latin word "mater" meaning "mother".  You may even wish to think of this eternal male-female duo as producing a third, a child, whose nature partakes of both male and female natures, both God and man.  We may even say that this child is the "Light of the World".  By referring to our restatement of Einstein's famous equation we can now say metaphysically that:

 

                    ____________

            C =   \/   E / M

 

Where:      E = realm of Spirit                 (Father)

            M = realm of Matter                 (Mother)

            C = product of Spirit and Matter    (the Son) or the universal constant: Light

 

    Light, as we know, is an electro-magnetic vibration or wave. It acts in some ways as if it is composed of particles (called photons) and except for being weightless susceptible to the laws of matter.  In other ways it behaves as if it were nothing but a wave phenomenon and subject only to the laws of magnetism.  Neither view alone

is correct.  It partakes of both natures.  There is a magnetic component and a particle component which operate at right angles to one another and in perfect synchrony. When one component is at its maximum level, the other is at rest.  Then as that component declines in intensity, the other increases until it reaches its maximum just as the other component comes to a state of rest.

 

    This eternal alteration between the two primal universal forces is exactly what the symbol of the Taoists is all about.  We now know that all matter is nothing but patterns of energy in constant flux.  What we call matter is simply the nodal points (points on a standing wave where there appears to be no motion) of energy waves in constant motion.

 

    Scientists have even discovered that for every known particle of matter (e.g. electrons, protons, neutrons, mesons etc.) there is a corresponding particle of "anti-matter".  No one has ever seen a particle of anti-matter but they have been inferred to be present by carefully controlled scientific experiments.  I find it quite ironic

to see scientists who philosophically are often either agnostic or atheistic in their beliefs forced to a concept of unseen forces lying behind every known particle of matter.  It would never do for them to label these forces "spirit" so they label them "anti-matter" instead.

 

    Esoteric sources (the Bible included) teach that the visible realm comes from invisible ones.  Spiritual worlds come into being long before this material one and set the stage for it.  This long process of spirit descending into ever denser levels of matter is called "involution" and is somewhat analagous to putting on successive layers of

clothing with each outer layer being heavier and denser than the preceding one.

 

    When the lowest point in this descending arc is reached (the fourth level), the cycle reverses and the long journey back to the realm of spirit begins.  This process quite naturally is called "evolution".  From the "scientific" point of view the story starts at the appearance of matter ( the densest level) and after eons of time simple life-forms appear in the ocean and slowly some of them migrate onto the land.  Single cell creatures

become increasingly complex.  Some fish learn to deal with both water and land environments (the amphibians).  Some of these gradually evolve into reptiles and as their day wanes (some 60 million years ago) a small shrew-like mammal begins evolving which leads to the evolution of pithecoid, ape-like, creatures and finally to "homo sapiens" - a magnificient animal but an animal nonetheless.

 

    From the metaphysical point of view man was created by God in His own image (i.e. he was created a spiritual being).  His true nature is God-like not animal-like. During the process of involution man was created prior to the rest of the animal kingdom and not vice versa.  Higher life forms do not originate from lower ones; but lower ones originate from higher ones through the process of involution.

 

    The biblical story of the creation of Adam in the image of God, of Eve being formed from one of Adam's ribs, the original home of man in the Garden of Eden, and the fall of man through eating of the apple from the tree which gave him knowledge of good and evil - all relate to this process of "involution", of the process of separation of man from his original state as a spiritual being.

 

    This is not to deny the story of how life evolved on earth obtained by examination of the fossil remains from one era to the next, but it is only part of the story, and from the standpoint of man the least important part of the story. That man is a spiritual being, temporarily imprisoned in a body which was evolved for and by him from materials on the earth over long eons of time, whose ultimate destiny is to regain "Paradise Lost", to overcome death, to complete the ceaseless rounds of birth and rebirth - that is the most important part of the story. "Remember then from what you have fallen, repent and do the works you did at first. . . . To him who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of Life which is in the Paradise of God." (Revelation 2:5-7)

 

    You may remember the story in the Old Testament of Jacob's dream of a ladder going from the earth up to heaven and on this ladder were angels ascending and descending. (Genesis 28:12) Or again you may recall that when Lucifer (an archangel, whose name means "light bearer") fell to earth after losing the battle for heaven to the archangel Michael, he swept down one-third of the stars of heaven (his angels) to earth with him.

(Revelation 12:4). In this manner the opposite poles of good and evil were separated by which means man is allowed to exercise his free-will choice to move up the ladder toward life eternal or down the ladder toward death and destruction.

 

    Lest you are wont to label the philosophy expounded thus far as nothing but a spiritual-material dualism, the eternal duel between the two poles of yang and yin, let me quickly introduce a third element.  After all, as you will remember from the account of my "Eureka" experience at age 36, I was reading at the time a discussion between Betty and friends on "the other side" of the nature of the Holy Trinity - the three aspects or modes of being in the Godhead.  I would much prefer, therefore, to be labeled a ternarian (one who belives in the essential threefoldness of reality) than one who is labeled a monist, dualist or pluralist.

 

    Carl Jung maintains that one who only thinks in terms of three is missing one of the essential aspects of reality because the mandalas of wholeness always appear in history, art, or out of the subconsious of his troubledpatients as a quartenary.  There are others who are convinced that reality is septenary (sevenfold) in its essence or duodecanary (twelvefold).  The truth, of course, is that these and all other number based systems

are all only partial aspects of the one and only reality. "E pluribus unum" (from many, one) or better "e unibus plurum" (from one, many) would be closer to the true nature of reality. We are all like the "Six Blind Men of Hindustan", that delightful poem by John Godfrey Saxe, that each described a different aspect of what the Elephant was like based on the particular part he happened to grab hold of. "Now we see through a glass darkly" as   

Paul tells us in one of his letters to the Corinthians.

 

    One of the oldest, if not the oldest, extant writing in the world is found in the Chinese "I Ching" or "Book of Changes". It supposedly was created by the legendary emperor, Fu Hsi (2953-2838 B.C.).  It forms the basis for many of the teachings of Confucius and also of Lao-Tsu, the founder of Taoism.  It is not only a philosophy about

the nature of things (all of which are combinations of the primal forces of "yin" and "yang"), but also a cosmology and a methodolgy for predicting futute events.  The concept of the Tao, while implicit in the "I Ching" as the source of the interaction of two primal forces, was not formulated into a philosophy until the Fifth Century B.C. by Lao-Tsu. From his writings in the "Tao Te Ching" we read about the nature of Tao:

 

                        "Out of the Tao, One is born:

                         Out of One, Two;Out of Two, Three:

   Out of Three, the myriad things." (Ch. XLII)

 

"There is a Thing evolved from the chaos,

Which existed before Heaven and Earth.

 

                          Formless and Boundless,

                          It stands alone and never changes;

                          It pervades and endures.

                    It may be conceived as the mother of the world." (Ch. XXV)

 

    Not only do all things proceed from the one ground of all being, from "isness" to “existence", from the invisible to the visible, but also there are cycles connected with all changes in which one thing changes into its opposite and back to its original form "ad infinitum".  (Carl Jung calls this process of a thing changing into its opposite "enantiodromia"). This accounts for the "I Ching" (pronounced "Yee Ching") being used for predicition as well as for a system of cosmology. As the French say: "Le plus ca change, le plus ca meme", i.e.,(the more it changes, the more it is the same.) The same idea is in the Old Testament in the Book of Ecclesiates:

 

"For everything there is a season and and a time for every

                 matter under heaven."                       (Eccl. 3:1).

 

                Or again from the "Tao Te Ching" (Ch. LXXVII):

 

                "The Tao of Heaven is like the stretching of a bow.

                 It brings down what is high;

                 It lifts up what is low;

                 It depletes what is abundant;

                 It augments what is deficient.

                 Such is the Tao of Heaven:

                 It depletes the abundant and augments the deficient."

 

And from the commentary on the Feng Hexagram in the "I Ching":

 

`              "When the sun has reached its meridian height,

                 It begins to decline.

                 When the moon has become full,

                 It begins to wane.

                 Heaven and Earth are now full, now empty,

                 According to the flow and ebb of the season"

 

    (Shortly after my "Eureka" experience I became a charter subscriber to a publication on the study of cycles, which might well be the topic of another essay, but meanwhile let us return to a discussion of the "threeness" aspect of reality and its relation to the production of "the many things".)

 

    Christian theology teaches us about the threefold nature of God (and therefore of all reality). He is, we are told, three persons in one: Father, Son and Holy Ghost.  Many early church councils wrestled with the question of whether the Son proceded directly from the Father or through the dual working of the Father and Holy Spirit.  As stated in the Nicene Creed, the Church Fathers finally decided that the Son comes directly from the

Father and the Holy Ghost is generated by the joint action of Father and Son.  (The word, "filioque", meaning "and from the Son",  was added by the Roman Church in the 9th Century A.D. but was  rejected by the Eastern Church who preferred "from the Father through the Son".)

 

    Other religions have elected to substitute a feminine Deity for the Holy Spirit and make the Son a product of the union of the divine Father and Mother. (e.g. Horus, the Egyptian "Light of the World", is the offspring of Osiris and Isis, the Brother-Sister, Husband-Wife, duo who represented the Sun and the Moon deities.)  However, the Hindu Son of God, Vishnu, springs from the hidden Father aspect of the Hindu trimurti, Siva, but Brahma, the feminine aspect, is brought into being by Vishnu through the action of the lotus which springs from his navel.  In the Hindu triad of Siva, Vishnu and Brahma, Siva is the Destroyer, Vishnu the Preserver, and Brahma the Creator. The nature of Siva is "Ananda" (Happiness) and the real life while that produced by the interaction of Vishnu and Brahma is Maya (Illusion) - the substitute life.

 

    In so called "esoteric" literature ("Esoteric" means secret.) we read about the "Logos" (which is a Greek word meaning "the word" ) who, after his manifestation as a unity, becomes twofold and then threefold in nature.  The first aspect, the Father, is the root of all being who is immanent in every atom of the universe.  The second aspect arises from the first and forms the primal duality from which the web of the universe is woven (e.g. life-form, spirit-matter, positive-negative, male-female, etc.). From this twofold aspect of the Logos the third arises, which can be described as Universal Mind or Consiousness, in which all things to be created exist archetypically.

 

    This Divine "Logos" or "Word" is described eloquently in the Gospel of John:

 

 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with

God, and the Word was God.  He was in the beginning with

God; all things were made through Him and without Him was

not anything made that was made." (John 1:1-3)

 

    John is, of course, speaking of the Christ prior to his incarnation as the man, Jesus.  Jesus himself confirms this identity many times in the New Testament.  "Before Abraham was, I am.", his constant reference to the Father and him being one, the confirmation of his identity as the Christ to Simon Peter, etc. etc.

 

    This fundamental "threeness" of the Godhead is reflected throughout all creation and even in man himself, who was created in the image and likeness of God. Consider the nature of light, which is only one octave in a huge spectrum of electromagnetic wave phenomena (long radio waves to cosmic rays).  Light, when all its wavelengths are present equally, is seen to be white in color.  However, we know that there are three primary colors or wavelengths: viz. red, green and blue. (Color TV for example uses these three colors of phosphors to produce these and all the other colors which you see on the screen.) Although when white light is separated by a prism, it displays the familiar seven colors of the rainbow (violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red), we know that violet , indigo, yellow and orange can be produced by combinations of the three primary colors.

 

    In bringing celestial phenomena down to earth in mixing pigments to produce colors we find that there are also three colors that are primary: red, blue and yellow. All of the others (save white) can be produced by combinations of these three.  Interestingly, when the three primary pigments are blended together in equal strength, the resulting color is black, the opposite of white.  (It is also interesting to note that just as the three primary colors combine to make the seven colors of the rainbow, the ancient wisdom teaches that seven creative spirits spring from the Third Logos.  "As above, so below.")

 

    Similarly, in music there are seven notes in the major and minor scales (do, re, mi, fa, sol, la and te with the eighth note forming the octave, exactly double in frequency to the first note ), but the fundamental chord of all harmony is the triad (do, mi, sol).                

 

    Further examples from the physical realm could be given to illustrate the universality of the threeness of things, but let us look instead at man - the "paragon of animals", as Shakespeare calls him.  The psalmist asks:

 

   “What is man that Thou art mindful of him?

    And the son of man that Thou visitest him?

    For Thou hast made him a little lower than the angels,

    And hast crowned him with glory and honor.

    Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of Thy hands;

     Thou hast put all things under his feet."(Psalm 8:4-6)

 

    In the quotation above the word translated as "angels" in the King James version is the Hebrew word "Elohim" which can be translated either as "God" or as "Gods". Thus the psalmist actually means to elevate man even closer to God than the angels.  In the story of the creation we read that on the sixth day:

 

       

 

    Thus the bible clearly states that man is a spiritual being created in the image of God, who has been placed on the earth to watch over and have dominion over it and over

all of its creatures.  Since the Godhead is threefold in nature, so, therefore, must be man.  It is not surprising then that ancient as well as modern concepts describe man

as being three-in-one: Spirit-Soul-Body (where the soul is a compound of his mental and emotional natures).  Not only do we think of ourselves as being composed of Body, Soul

(or Mind) and Spirit, but there is also a threefold division within each of these three realms.  Let us begin with an examination of the threefold characteristic of the

body of man.

 

    In the physical realm we know that man, and virtually the entire animal kingdom that reproduces sexually, evolves from a fertilized cell (called the zygote) which, as it begins to subdivide and multiply, separates into three primary types of germ layers: the ectoderm, the mesoderm, and the endoderm.  Just as the ancient wisdom teaches that the one became two and the two, three, so does the one fertilized cell, the embryo, first separate

into two types of cells (the ectodermal and endodermal layers). The middle layer, the mesodermal, then develops from and between the other two.  From the ectodermal cells arise the outer layers of the animal including the skin and the nervous system.  From the endodermal cells evolve the internal organs and alimentary canal.  Lastly, from

the mesodermal cells are developed the connective tissues, the muscles and skeletal framework.

 

    The anthropologist, Shelton, even developed a primary classification of human bodily types based on which layer of cells apparently were predominant during gestation: the ectomorph, or skinny type, when the ectodermal cells predominated; the endomorph, or corpulent type, when the endodermal cells were predominate; and the mesomorph, or

muscular type, when the mesodermal cells dominated the development.

 

    In the fully developed individual or animal we learn that there are three dynamic processes going on within every cell in the body: anabolism, catabolism and metabolism.  Anabolism is the process by which food is assimilated by the organism while catabolism is the process by which waste products are excreted.  The anabolic forces are thus engaged in building up the organism while the catabolic are engaged in the tearing down process.  Metabolism is the process by which these two opposing forces are kept in balance.  They are in short: the creating, destroying, and preserving forces necessary for the well-being of all organic life.

 

    Does this remind you of the Hindu concept of the nature of the Godhead?  You will recall that Siva is known as the Destroyer, Brahma as the Creator, and Vishnu as the Preserver.  Or how about the dream of Jacob seeing the angels ascending and descending the ladder?  Do we not live in a world where new life constantly appears while other life dies and disappears in regular and ordered progression?  Is it not plausible that this eternal cycle of birth and death, of appearance and disappearance, of life forms is simply the ebb and flow of that all pervasive Causeless Cause, the Ground of All Being, Great Spirit, the Tao, life-force, elan vital or by whatever name you choose to call it?

 

    Now let us move up the ladder of life from the physical realm to the realm of soul or mind.  It hardly needs to be stated the mind is superior to or dominant over the world of things.  It makes a good analogy to the method by which the third aspect of the Logos creates the visible world.  Man, who was created in the image of God,

is also a creator and brings into being creations which once were only in his mind.  One of my favorite little verses (whose author I don't recall) tells us about this creative power of the mind of man:

 

                       "Mind is the master power that molds and makes;

                        And Man is Mind, and evermore he takes

                        The tools of thought and thinking what he wills,

                        Brings forth a thousand joys and a thousand ills.

                        He thinks in secret and it comes to pass.

                        Environment is his looking glass."

 

    I particular like the line in this little verse "and Man is Mind" because it is the middle kingdom between Body and Spirit, between Heaven and Earth.  In this realm

arises consciousness not only of the world about us, but also of the world within us and also of our consciousness of self.  (I can see you have already guessed the triad of

mind and its analogy to the triads of the physical body.)

 

    I could very easily put on my metaphysical hat here and talk about the triad of the subconsious, conscious, and superconscious levels of mind; but instead let us use

the threefold division of the psyche introduced by Sigmund Freud: the Id, the Ego, and the Super Ego (or Ego Ideal) which will reflect a more "scientific" approach to the

subject.

 

    As you may recall from Psychology 101, the Id is short for the Libido (pronounced "Luh bee'doh") from which arises all of man's sexual and instinctual urges. ("Libido" is the Latin word for "instinct".)  Freud taught that there are two basic types or classes of instincts: one concerned with life and its preservation, the other with death and the destruction of life.  The Greeks personified them as the deities, Eros and Thanatos. (Yes,

here comes anabolism and catabolism again - the life force and the death force.)  I remember the first time that the idea of a "death wish" or death instinct was impressed on

me as a reality and not just as a philosophical concept. I was involved in constructing "mortality" tables for oil pipe lines to be used for ICC valuation and ratemaking purposes.  In doing research on the shape of mortality curves I ran across a discussion of how a statistician named Gompertz had developed the human mortality curve by assuming that we are born with a given quantity of life which dissipates slowly throughout our life.  In other words each day we die a little.  At birth the life force is at a maximum and the death force at a minimum (the anabolic processes are stronger than the catabolic ones.)

As time goes on, however, the life force  diminishes and the death force increases.  Much the same process is at work in the decay of radioactive isotopes into lighter and

more stable elements.  This theoretical construct almost perfectly fitted the facts of human mortality except for corrections for accidental death and for countries which had a high incidence of infant mortality due to poverty and a lack of proper medical facilities.

 

    The libido or Id, then, represents an unconscious realm of the psyche from which springs all of the primitive urges accumulated by the race since its creation

millions of years ago.  As Carl Jung discovered, the unconscious levels of mind also contained all of mankind's mythological motifs, which, when activated, took on a life

of their own.  "Archetypes" was the name he gave to these primordial images inherited by all men no less than they inherit the anatomy of their physical bodies from their

progenitors.  Interestingly, Jung condidered Freud's libido to be synonymous with "psychic energy" - again pointing to a fountain of primordial instincts and urges.

 

    The middle layer of the psyche, the ego, is the one most obvious to us since one of its primary components is the sense of individuality - the "I" or "me" feeling each

of us has.  It includes also the rest of all that we are conscious of at any one time.  The ego as Carl Jung defines it is simply: "the centrum of consiousness". In modern man the ego usually is a reasonably well-defined and unitary complex.  In primitive man, however, consciousness is not nearly as well-defined and partakes only occasional forays into the realm of self-awareness.  Dr. Bucke's book, "Cosmic Consciousness", describes the

evolution of consciousness in four quantum leaps: (1) the perceptual mind; (2) the receptual mind (simple consciousness); (3) the conceptual mind (self-consciousness); and (4) the intuitional mind (cosmic consciousness) each builds upon the former and contains all the earlier stages.  He makes the analogy of these various levels to dimensions of awareness with cosmic consciousness corresponding to the fourth dimension of reality.  Only man has attained the third level of self-consiousness and only a few men have thus far achieved the level of "cosmic" consciousness.  ("Many are called, but few are

chosen" to inherit the kingdom of Heaven.)

 

    As Freud defines it, the third division of the psyche, the superego (or ego ideal), arises as a reaction formation between the ego and the libido.  It is largely an autonomous complex and therefore often acts as if it were an independent person.  It is often heard by those suffering from paranoia as a voice.  To most of us though the ego ideal or superego is simply the "voice of conscience" that prompts us when we are about to do something not in accord with this ideal standard and then makes us feel guilty after we disregard this "still small voice".

 

    The end result of this mental triad is that the ego finds itself in the middle between often conflicting urges and standards of behavior.  What I "ought" to do is often in conflict with what I "desire" to do.  The greater the tension created by the polarization of the libido and the superego, the greater the sense of anxiety felt by the ego.  If the libido has its way and goads the ego into action, the ego suffers disapproval from those who it needs for support (parents, teachers, friends, family, peers, society, etc.).  It thereby suffers "the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune". One's sense of self-respect and self-worth are diminished by giving in to these primitive urges from the libido.

 

    On the other hand if the superego has its way and inhibits the action which would gratify the libido, the urge is repressed from consiousness back into the unconscious where it remains only at the expense of considerable psychic energy by the ego.  This can become the basis for phobias and even neuroses unless a resolution for the conflict is found.  So it appears to be a case of "damned if you do and damned if you don't" - a

real "Catch 21" situation.

 

    This is, however, nature's way of bringing to your attention those areas in your life that must be faced and overcome in order for soul growth to occur. ("I have set before you Life and Death .....", Eros and Thanotos,  "Therefore choose Life that both thou and thy seed may live." - Deut. 30:19).  Repression may succeed in driving the urges and fantasies from the libido back into the unconscious where they very well may take on a life of

their own (an autonomous complex).  They more often are projected onto an object or situation in the external world (an object cathexis) again and again until the conflict is either finally resolved or personality disorders manifest themselves.

 

    The key to a healthy mind and psyche is to bring repressed urges, feelings, and unconscious desires back into consciousness, deal with them out in the open, and make them part of the conscious personality (i.e. the ego) ("First cleanse the inside of the cup and of the plate, that the outside also may be clean." Matthew 23:26.) Some of this unconscious material may not be very pleasant to deal with.  It may even be dirty and filthy.  An oldalchemical maxim tells us that the philosopher's stone, the pearl of great price, is buried in filth ("In stecore invenitur". It is found in filth.).

 

    Carl Jung refers to this hidden aspect of the personality as the Shadow archetype.  He is usually the same sex as we are and often is with us in our dreams. Some may perceive him to be evil in nature (i.e. a "d'evil", or derived from evil) - hence the difficulty in

admitting that he is part and parcel of our own personality.  Nevertheless, to admit his existence, even at the risk of damaging our precious ego, is a necessary step in the normal growth and development of the psyche. Fortunately, there is another component in the subconscious which more than compensates for the presence of this Shadow nature, or darker aspect of the personality.

 

    Another way of looking at Freud's widely-taught concepts of the id, ego, and ego-ideal structure of the psyche is to consider it in terms of subconscious, conscious, and super-conscious levels of reality - analogous to the body, mind, and spirit of man.  Freud

would undoubtedly turn over in his grave for someone to suggest that his notion of the superego is nothing less than the spirit of "Christ within you, the hope of Glory",as St. Paul describes it.  Carl Jung chooses to call it the archetype of the "Self" (with a capital "S").  Emerson and other transcendentalists call it the Oversoul.  Hindus call it the "Atman".  Nietzsche calls it the "Superman", etc., etc., etc.

 

    This is the same concept that is embodied in that magnificent monument we call the Sphinx erected thousands of years ago in the Egyptian desert alongside the pyramids.  Here is a mysterious figure with the body of an animal, the face of a man, and the headdress of a God.

 

               "What is man that Thou art mindful of him . . .

                Yet Thou hast made him little less than God

                And dost crown him with glory and honor." (Pslm 8 RSV)

 

               "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are

                the sons of God - the Spirit itself beareth witness

                with our spirit, that we are the children of God; and

                if children, then heirs; heirs of God, joint-heirs

                with Christ . . (Romans 8:14-17)

 

                "I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children

                 of the most High."  (Psalm 82:6)

       

    Thus man himself is the Sphinx with the body of an animal but with a covering around his head meant only for the gods.  Psychologists and psychiatrists speak in terms of "wholeness" as the desired result of their treatments while ministers, rabbis, and priests speak of "holiness" as the desired end result.  As you probably know, the words "wholeness" and "holiness" come from the same root and therefore point to the same or a similar desired outcome - one at the level of the mind or psyche and the other at the level of the spirit.

 

    The symbol used by the Y.M.C.A. is an inverted triangle, which stands for the threefold nature of man: body, mind, and spirit.  The fact that the triangle is

inverted indicates that the organization's primary emphasis is on the physical portion of the triad.  The Star of David, on the other hand, which is the primary symbol of Judaism, is composed of two interlaced triangles, one of whose apexes points downward while

another points upward.  A variation of this symbol is called the Seal of Solomon. In this symbol the triangle pointing downward is black and the one pointing upward is white with both triangles inscribed within a circle.

 

  (This is the symbol I used as the "logo" for my "Realize Your Potential" course.  The correspondence of the Seal of Solomon with the symbol of Taoism and the cosmology found

in the Chinese "I Ching" will be the subject of another essay.  Suffice it to say at this point that the "I Ching" bases its whole philosophy on two groups of trigrams each

composed of three elements, one trigram representing the outer reality and one the inner reality.)

 

    The introduction of the second triangle not only gives more balance to the single one standing on its head, but it also reminds us that man has a spiritual nature as well

as a physical one. The Hindus, who have been studying the nature of reality longer than any of the other major religions, even provide us names for each of these six points - three associated with Brahma, the female aspect of the Hindu trimurti, and three associated with Vishnu, the second aspect of their trinity of beings contained in the Godhead.  They call these aspects "gunas", or modes of being.  The three gunas or aspects of Brahma, the creator of the outer world, are "tamas", "rajas", and "sattwa", translated roughly as "matter", "energy", and "law" respectively.

 

    In the inner world, the world of mind or consiousness, characterized by Vishnu, are the three gunas of "ichchha", "jnana", and "kriya", translated more or less as "will",

"love", and "thought" respectively.  Sometimes the second aspect is also called "wisdom" and the third, "activity". A diagram may make the relationship of these six gunas to

the points on the Star of David and Seal of Solomon a

little clearer:

 

 

       Ichchha (Will)    Sattwa   --------------  Rajas

             /\           (Law)   \            / (Energy)

            /  \                   \  Brahma  /

           /    \                   \        /

          /      \                   \      /

         / Vishnu \                   \    /

        /          \                   \  /

Jnana  /------------\ Kriya             \/

(Love)              (Thought)       Tamas (Matter)

 

      THE INNER WORLD            THE OUTER WORLD

 

     Mind, Consciousness,     The realm of Existence,

     Time (as succession)      Space (as extension)

 

 

    Not shown, but symbolized by the circle in the Seal of Solomon and by the mystic center in the heart of the interlaced triangles, is "The "Unmoved Mover", "The

"Causeless Cause", "The Root of All Being", "I AM", "The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob", "Brahman", "The Father", "The Within-Without", "the circle whose point is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere".

 

    Suddenly, or so it would seem, our original trinity has become sixfold and by including the ever present mystical center, sevenfold.  If it were not for the

inter-relationship and intertwining of the inner and outer worlds expressed so well by the Star of David and the Seal of Solomon, we could easily have portrayed these two

triangles in the form of the letter "X" with the upper two points connected to form the upper triangle and the lower two points connected to form the lower triangle.  This

brings home the fact that the two worlds always intersect at a point of individualized manifestation, while the worlds without and within recede from that point in all

directions. (That is to say that the universe without and the universe within extend beyond the individualized expression in all directions without limit.)

 

 

   "The world hath many centers, one for each created

    being, and about each one it lieth in its own circle.

    Thou standest but half an ell from me, yet about thee

    lieth a universe whose center I am not but thou art."

 

                            Thomas Mann (Joseph in Egypt)

 

 

    I mentioned earlier a spiritual parallel to Einstein's formulation of the universal relationship between matter and energy expressed by his famous formula: E = MC square 

There is a rather startling confirmation of this parallel expressed by the three gunas of Brahma which are often translated by "matter", "energy", and "law".  Law after all is is a settled direction and like the velocity of light is a constant. To consider that these notions were formulated several thousand years ago is even more remarkable. (For more about the psychological nature of these three gunas read Chapter XIV of the "Bhagavad Gita", the sacred Hindu "Song of God").

 

    Naturally the three gunas pertaining to the inner world of Vishnu (i.e. mind or consciousness) are more psychological in nature.  Let me remind you only at this

point the parallel between these three aspects and Dorothy's three companions in the Land of Oz:  the cowardly lion who wished to find courage (i.e. the will to act), the tin man who had lost his heart, and the scarecrow who wanted a brain (i.e. the ability to think).

 

    Volumes could and have been written about analogies with these six (or seven) modes of being. (God created the heavens and earth in six days and on the seventh he rested.)  The pseudo-science of astrology is based on modes of behavior of the seven visible heavenly bodies in our solar system and the firmament of "fixed" stars behind them - the zodiac.

 

                These seven heavenly bodies are:

 

          1. The Sun     O    and children of the Sun

 

          2. Mars   -|-   and 3. Venus    O

                     O                   -|-

          4. The Moon   )    and children of the Moon

 

          5. Jupiter   )_|_  and 6. Saturn _|_   And

                         |                  | )

 

          7. Mercury    )O-|- the child of both Sun & Moon

 

    The glyphs for these familiar seven bodies may seem a little unfamiliar, however characters available to me to portray the conventional glyphs make necessary the above

approximations.  (The sign for Mercury, for example is lying on its side). These signs, however, do convey the primal character of the Sun and Moon and the derivative

character of the remaining five.  Further, the circle of the Sun symbolizes it as the source of all life while the symbol of the crescent moon indicates its life is obtained

by reflection from the sun.  (The similarity between this primal duo of Sun-Moon and Yin-Yang should be obvious.)    We are so accustomed to the names of the seven days of the week, we tend to forget that they correspond with the names of the above heavenly bodies of astrology and astronomy and that they are in turn names for ancient Gods: Sunday (Sun's day); Monday (Moon's day); Tuesday (Tyre's day); Wednesday (Woden's day); Thursday (Thor's

day); Friday (Freya's day); and Saturday (Saturn's day). If you are curious about what happened to Mars, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus, recall the days of the week in French

and Spanish whose languages are closer to the Latin of  Rome, and hence to the names of Roman gods, than our largely teutonic language is:

 

    English       French        Spanish          Planet

  ----------    ----------    ---------------   ----------

    Sunday       Dimanche       Domingo (Lord)     Sun

 

    Monday        Lundi         Lunes (from Luna)  Moon

 

    Tuesday       Mardi         Mardes (Mar's Day) Mars

 

    Wednesday     Mercredi      Miercoles          Mercury

 

    Thursday      Jeudi         Jueves             Jupiter

                  (Jude's day)

    Friday        Vendredi      Viernes            Venus

 

    Saturday      Samedi        Sabado (Sabbath)   Saturn

 

 

    Thus the ancients identified the visible heavenly bodies with the names of gods. (Uranus, Neptune and Pluto although invisible to the naked eye were also named for

ancient gods by our modern men of science).  Before you label this as simply the mistaken notion of earlier, and therefore more primitive, civilizations who believed in many gods (i.e. polytheism) condider the possibility of a deeper and hidden meaning.  The number seven has been regarded as a sacred number by many cultures, both ancient and modern.

 

 

    You will recall the Hebrew account of the Creation in Genesis (which was only written down after countless generations of oral transmission) whereby Yahweh or Jehovah created the world in six days and rested on the seventh.  For thousands of years the Jews have considered every seventh day as holy and commemorate God's resting on the seventh day.  The Jews called this day the Sabbath named after Jehovah Sabaoth, a Jewish equivalent of

Saturn. (Compare "Saturday" in English with the Spanish "Sabedo" which is still our seventh day of the week.)

 

    Also from ancient Hebrew tradition comes the use of the minorah, the seven branched candleholder, prominently displayed in their temples.  Lighted candles are considered by almost all religions as symbolic of the spiritual side of reality.  The shape of the minora is of interest:

 

    As you may recall, there are three branches to the left of the central candle shaft and three branches to the right.  Further, each of the three branches on the left side are connected by a single arc to the corresponding branch on the right side of the central

shaft.  It takes very little imagination to see the analogy of this figure to the six-pointed star resting on a seventh (but invisible) point in the center.  The form of the minorah also brings to mind the prophet Isaiah's vision of the seraphims (one of nine divisions of the angelic kingdom) who had three pair of wings and hovered above the throne of the Lord (Isaiah 6:2) - the head being the counterpart of the central candle shaft.

 

    Some examples of the symbolism of the number seven can also be drawn from the New Testament.  Recall John's vision on the Isle of Patmos, which is known to us by the

name of "The Revelation of St. John", wherein he is instructed to send its message to the seven churches of Asia: Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamos, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea.  His first vision is of seven golden candlesticks and in their midst one like the risen Christ who held in his right hand seven stars. (Rev. 1:11-16).  His second vision was of the Lord seated on his throne in heaven surrounded by the twenty-four elders and the four beasts "full of eyes before and behind". (Rev.4:6).  Each of the four beasts had six wings (like the seraphim of Isaiah) and before the throne "there were seven lamps of fire . . . which are the seven spirits of God." (Rev. 4:5). Also there was on the throne a book sealed with seven seals, opened in turn by one of seven angels with seven vials, seven plagues, etc. etc.

 

    Edgar Cayce in one of his clairvoyant readings on the Book of Revelation says that the seven churches refer to the seven psychic centers within man and each of these is

stimulated in proper order by repeating the Lord's prayer. "Our Father" represents the pituitary gland located in the top of the head, the master gland in the body which

controls all the others.  "Thy Name", the Logos in Greek, represents the pineal gland in the middle of the head, the "third eye" of the Hindus and Buddhists. "Thy Will" represents the thyroid glands around the throat which controls our activity and energy levels.  (These three glands or centers are analogous to the inner triad of gunas associated with the Hindu God, Vishnu, and therefore are all located appropriately in the head of man, which represents his spiritual nature    "Our daily bread" represents the gonads or sexual

center of the body, the seat of earthly or terrene energies, to which the Hindus give the name of "kundalini".  "Our debts" (or "trespasses") represent the adrenal glands located above each of the kidneys, which are the source of the hormone adrenaline which stimulates

the activity of the autonomic nervous system.  Cayce tells us that the adrenals are also the seat of the soul within the human body.  "Temptation" represents the Lyden gland

or "cells of Lydig" located just above the gonadal area. Cayce tells us that this is the center that controls the balance between the male and female natures which we all

possess.  Lastly, "Evil" represents the thymus gland located behind the heart, the center of the body. ("As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he." "For out of the

heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies." Matt. 15:19).

 

    We can see the same symbolism in legends and fairy tales (e.g. Snow White and the seven dwarfs, Mohammed's rope with seven knots, etc.).  Further, I have already alluded to the seven component colors of sunlight and the seven notes of the musical scale in the realm of physical phenomena.  But enough of allegories and allusions for the moment.  The point of all of these illustrations and examples is to persuade you that behind these ancient, primitive, and abstract notions lie great truths and insights into the nature of reality.  It is a very sad and tragic mistake to assume that our era with its great

scientific knowledge and marvelous inventions is superior in all respects to those civilizations which have gone before us. 

 

    We have but to consider the erection of the pyramids thousands of years ago without the benefit of "modern" technology to put our achievements in proper perspective.

Furthermore, if the true nature of man is spiritual and not animal, then past cultures who studied the invisible worlds of the psyche and who walked and talked with the spirits all around them may have been closer to the ultimate reality than any of our modern thinkers, who either consider the only reality to be that which we can feel, smell, taste, touch or hear or that man represents the pinnacle of creation whose spiritual concepts are nothing but a carryover from our primitive progenitors. (Jerry Falwell and others refer to this type of philosophy as "secular humanism".)

 

    After a rather extended excursion into the realm of the symbolism connected with the numbers 3, 6, and 7 let us now return to the discussion of the three triads connected with the body, mind (or soul), and spirit of man.  By far the most difficult of the three levels of reality to explain on my part, and to understand on the readers' part, is the realm of "spirit".  It is most difficult on the one hand because it is the most abstract

of the three realms, that is most remote from the material world in which we are enmeshed, and on the other hand because our modern era has conditioned us to accept the visible world as the one and the only true reality.

 

    An excerpt from one of Robert Browning's poems makes the point about the nature of Truth ( i.e. the ultimate reality) far better than I ever could in clumsy prose:

 

               "Truth is within ourselves; it takes no rise

                From outward things, whate'er you may believe.

                There is an inmost center in us all,

                Where truth abides in fulness; and around,

                Wall upon wall, the gross flesh hems it in,

                This perfect, clear perception, which is truth.

 

                A baffling and perverting carnal mesh

                Binds it, and makes all error: and to know,

                 Rather consists in opening out a way

                 Whence the imprisoned splendor may escape,

                Than in effecting entry for a light

                Supposed to be without."

 

                                      (From his "Paracelsus")

 

    It is in the effort to discover this "inmost center" that the real "Self" and "Spirit" of a man may be discovered.  Shakespeare admonishes us:

 

             "To thine own self be true;

              And it follows as must night the day,

              Thou canst not then be false to any man."

 

    Also you may remember those famous maxims:

 

            "Know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."

 

 and simply "Know thyself."

 

   Or as Jesus tells us through the Christ within him and within us all potentially):

 

            "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one

             comes to the Father, but by me." (John 14:6)

 

    The key to unlocking Truth, Freedom, and Knowledge, as shown by the above quotations, lies within oneself.  The question to be answered then is: Who are we really?  Are

we who other people think we are?  Are we who we think we are now? Or are we who we would aspire to be?  The answer to a large extent depends on our state of being or what

psychologists call our "self-concept", our perception of ourself.  How we decide this question of who we are largely determines our life experience.  What we make of our lives is largely up to us.  Again let us call on some, perhaps familiar, quotations to make this point more eloquently:

 

 

        "You will be what you will to be;

         Let failure find its false content

         In that poor word "environment",

         But Spirit scorns it and is free.

 

        It masters time, it conquers space.

        It cows that boastful trickster Chance,

         And bids the tyrant Circumstance

         Uncrown and fill a servant's place.

 

        Be not impatient in delay,

       But wait as one who understands;

       When Spirit rises and commands

       The Gods are ready to obey

 

        The river seeking for the sea

        Confronts the dam and precipice,

        Yet knows it cannot fail or miss;

        You will be what you will to be!"

                          

                    (Ella Wheeler Wilcox)

 

        "A man's reach must exceed his grasp;

         Else what's a heaven for?"

 

                        (Robert Browning)

 

         "Life is too short to waste

          In critic peep or cynic bark.

          'Twill soon be dark;

          Up! Mind thine own aim, and

          God speed the mark!"

 

                 (Ralph Waldo Emerson)

 

 

          "I am only one, but still I am one!

           I cannot do everything, but I can do something!"

 

                        (Edward Everett Hale)

 

           "Truly, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain

           'Be taken up and cast in the sea' and does not

            doubt in his heart, but believes that what he says

            will come to pass, it will be done for him.  Therefore

            I tell you, whatever you ask in prayer, believe that

            you will receive it, and you will."

 

                          (Jesus, the Christ) (Mark 11:23)

 

           "Believe that life is worth living and your belief will

            create the fact.  Be not afraid to live."

 

                                    (William James)

 

            "Do something worth living for, worth dying for;

             Do something to show that you have a mind, and a

             heart, and a soul within you."

 

                                    (Dean Stanley)

 

           "Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy

            might; For there is no work, nor device, nor know-

            ledge, nor wisdom in the grave, whither thou goest."

 

                                    (Ecclesiastes 9:10)

 

           "There is a tide in the affairs of men

            When taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

            Missed, the balance of their lives

            Is spent in shallows and in miseries."

 

                                    (Shakespeare)

 

   "Man makes the circumstances, and spiritually as well 

    as economically is the artificer of his own fortune."

 

                                    (Thomas Carlyle)

 

   "Knowledge we ask not, for knowledge Thou hast lent;

    But the will, oh Lord,

    There lies our bitter need.

    Help us to build above the deep intent

    The deed! The deed!"

 

                     (John Drinkwater, English Theologian)

 

   "Man in his weakness is the creature of circumstances;

    Man in his strength is the creator of circumstances.

   "Whether he be victim or victor depends largely on

          himself."

                                    (David Starr Jordan)

 

 

   "Man is not the creature of circumstances;

    Circumstances are the creatures of men."

 

                                    (Benjamin Disraeli)

 

   "Our belief at the beginning of a doubtful undertaking

    is the one thing that insures the successful outcome

    of our venture."

 

                                    (William James)

 

   "The universe is not to be narrowed down to the limits

    of the understanding,

    which has been men's practice up to now;

    but the understanding must be stretched and enlarged

    to take in the image of the universe as it is

    discovered."

 

                                    (Francis Bacon)

 

   "You cannot put new wine in old wineskins."

 

                                    (Jesus, the Christ)

 

   "Men at sometimes are masters of their fates;

    the fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars

    but in ourselves, that we are underlings."

 

                                    (Julius Caesar, Act I)

 

   "I am the master of my fate.

    I am the captain of my soul."

 

                        (From "Invictus" by Ernest Henley)

 

   "I can do all things thru Christ who strengtheneth me."

 

                                     (St. Paul)

 

   "Let that mind be in you which was in Christ Jesus."

 

                                     (St. Paul)

 

   "Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed

    by the renewal of your mind, that you may prove what

    is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and

    perfect."

                               (St. Paul - Romans 12:2)

 

   "To dream the impossible dream

    To fight the unbeatable foe

    To bear with unbearable sorrow

    To run where the brave dare not go

 

    To right the unrightable wrong

    To love pure and chaste from afar

    To try when your arms are too weary

    To reach the unreachable star

    This is my quest to follow that star

    No matter how hopeless, no matter how far

    To fight for the right without question or pause

    To be willing to march into Hell

    For a heavenly cause.

 

    And I know if I'll only be true to this glorious quest

    That my heart will lie peaceful and calm

    When I'm laid to my rest

    And the world will be better for this

    That one man scorned and covered with scars

    Still strove with his last ounce of courage

    To reach the unreachable stars.

 

          (The Impossible Dream -  The Man of LaMancha)

 

 

    The essence of Spirit is Life, the "sine qua non" of anyone and anything, and it expresses itself as a separate entity or being.  Many books have been written "On

Becoming a Real Person", "How to Win Friends and Influence People", and how to overcome all of our anxieties, fears, and feelings of inferiority and inadequacy.  What usually

is not written about, however, is how to find out who you really are and how to let others see the person you discover yourself to be.  (Paul Tillich's "The Courage To Be" being a notable exception to the rule.) Some of us simply accept what others have told us about ourselves as being true (both good and bad) and bury or repress any feelings or ideas that run contrary to this image.  In time we identify more and more with this "outer-directed"

person until we, in fact, become what others have said about us.  (Notice that this is a self-fulfilling prophecy built around the identity we have accepted about ourselves.)

 

    This outer self, the face we show to the world, is what Carl Jung calls our "persona".  This word has the same root as "person" and "personality".  Its ordinary English use (and original Latin  meaning) is to designate an actor or person appearing on stage.  In ancient theater presentations the actors frequently wore masks (e.g. a sad or a happy face) and the word "persona" was also used to designate this mask.  If we break the Latin root "personae" down into its components, we have "per" (through) and "sonare" (to sound).  So the "persona" is an actor who "sounds through his "mask", his false self.

 

    As we mature, we become conscious of the fact that much of our lives is spent in role playing (e.g. as child, parent, teacher, student, boss, employee, etc.)  Many people expect those playing these roles to be what they expect a person in that role to be like; (e.g. We expect our ministers, priests, or rabbis to be above reproach, like Caesar's wife, and we expect children to respect their elders and to be obedient, etc.) and because people expect it, we play the role.

 

    Most of us realize, however, that we are not really the person other people think we are or the person they want us to be.  That is, we have a private as well as a public side to our concept of self. One is a reflection of our being, our individuality, at the level of the world of sense while the other, although including this level, also includes the largely hidden world of our private thoughts and feelings.  Carl Jung believed that each of us turn a portion of our true selves to the world as a primary emphasis (either our thinking, feeling, sensual, or intuitive natures) with the other portions remaining

partially or totally obscured.  "Wholeness", in his view.  requires that during our lifetime we expose all of these functions to the outer world so as to achieve a balance

between the opposite natures within all of us.

 

    Many of us, particularly men, identify their essential self or sense of individuality with their mind, while others, usually women, more often identify with their emotions or feelings.  You may recall the phrase from the verse I cited on the nature of mind, "and Man is Mind", which illustrates those  who make the identification of the self (with a small "s") with the mind.  You may also recall the now famous starting point of the philosopher, Rene Descartes: "Cogito, ergo sum". ("I think, therefore I am.")  Those of us who have had some type of "mystical" experience might think it makes more sense to begin our philosophy by positing: "Sum, ergo cogito", but that is getting ahead of our exposition on the threefold nature of the spirit, or the essence of one's being.

 

    As mentioned earlier in this little essay, what we call our "self-consciousness" is of comparatively recent development in man and not very well developed at all in primitive tribes living in isolated areas of the world today.  We can infer this from observing the development of a child.  When he first begins to talk, there is no reference to self.  Later he learns to identify himself by the name people call him and later still does he begin to use the pronoun "I".

 

    Just as the fertilized egg goes through a lengthy process of retracing all of its ancestral history within the womb ("Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny."),so too does

the development of one's mental and psychological capacities retrace its ancestral phylogeny in early childhood. (Dr Bucke's book has an interesting discussion of this process.)  Since knowledge is a function of being, our sense of self goes along, hand-in-hand, with the development of our mental and moral faculties.  Sometimes, it is true, one may develop a sense of self which overreaches one's knowledge.  When one is puffed up

with self-importance, we say he is an egotist and has a "big head".  Conversely, one may have considerable knowledge but, as a result of innate shyness or conditioning, have an inadequate or lower than warranted sense of self.  In extreme cases we say such a person is suffering from an inferiority complex.

 

    The most common cause of an over-estimation or under-estimation of one's self-concept is an over-identification with the persona, the outer directed personality, which, as we discussed earlier, is never the true self but merely roles that we play or are expected to play in life. "Don't judge a book by its cover." or "First impressions may be deceiving." are typical admonitions from the conventional wisdom of society.

 

    Over-estimation or under-estimation of our self-concept can result, however, not only from the outer society or what Jung calls the "collective consciousness" but also from the impact on the individual of that inner society that Jung calls the "collective unconscious". Some have equated this concept with race memory, but it is much more than this.  Just as we inherit our physical bodies as a result of millions of years of evolution of life here on earth, so too do we inherit the distilled essence and knowledge of the entities that were responsible for this development.

 

    Dr. Jung, although accused by many of being too mystical in his concepts, was first and foremost a scientist of the psyche and had very little patience with metaphysical speculations (e.g. Theosophy).  That around which he developed his concepts of the psyche was based on his own clinical experiences with many hundreds, perhaps thousands, of patients.  It was as a result of these real life experiences of similar patterns and motifs emerging over and over again from the depths of his patients'subconscious minds that led him to a study of mythology, ancient religions, primitives, alchemy, fairy tales, theancient Chinese book on divination known as the "I Ching"etc., etc.

 

    After years of observation and study he concluded that these primordial images, which he named "archetypes", form as much the substrate of our psyche as does the human body

with all of its marvelous organs and structure form a common framework for our physical nature.  Jung gave names to these archetypes such as "the anima" (or "animus" in women), "the shadow", "the wise old man", the great mother", etc.  (See his essay entitled "Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious" for a fascinating esposition of these and other archetypes.)  The quintessential (the fifth essence, and therefore the highest) archetype,

however, is one that Jung simply calls "the Self" (with a capital "S"). [Just so you will be able to follow this somewhat rambling exposition, I am now moving into a discussion of the third level of spirit, or sense of "I am" - the first two being the persona (or outer self) and the ego (the centrum of our customary sense of self).]

 

    There is much to be said for the old maxim: "Let sleeping dogs lie" when we begin to discuss this aspect of reality because once you stir it up from the depths, it

may come to the surface (your consciousness) and upset your carefully constructed sense of who you are, what you are, and what you really should be accomplishing here on earth.  ("I charge you . . . that ye stir not up, nor  not awake my love till he please."

- Song of Solomon 2:7).

 

    In Jung's psychology the Self is the totality of one's being, both conscious and unconsious.  It therefore embraces the outer self, the private self, and the potential self - all that you are now, have been and can ever hope to be.  The essence of the mystical experience is the bringing to life of this primorial image, this archetype of the collective unconscious.  While the rewards for stealing this "fire" from the gods can be

great beyond measure, the penalties can include a profound sense of isolation and sadness.  As Isaiah said when confronted by a vision of the Lord sitting on his throne in heaven: "Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts." (Isaiah 6:5).

 

    The struggle to comprehend these spiritual visions can be an all consuming one.  That is why Jung advises (if one has a choice) to delay this quest until the second half of

life when the pursuit of worldly ambitions has hopefully run its course and one's sense of self is firmly established.  (The invasion of consciousness by these powerful primoridal images from the collective unconscious can easily overpower and swamp a poorly developed ego resulting in a full blown psychosis.)

 

    The stories of this quest for the heavenly prize are legion.  Recall in Greek mythology Jason and his quest for the golden fleece, the knights of yore and their quest for the Holy Grail, Ponce de Leon and his search for the fountain of youth, the alchemists and their quest for the "lapis philosophorum" (the philosopher's stone), Jesus in

his parables of the Kingdom (e.g. "the pearl of great price").  Or consider the centuries long quest by the Jews for the "promised land", the messianic vision of "a new heaven and a new earth", the vision of the "new Jerusalem", the lion lying down with the lamb, the

millennium following the second coming of Christ, etc., etc., etc.

 

    Just as the whole history of mankind has been one of millions of years of involution and evolution - of a descent from spirit into matter and now an ascent (however slowly) from matter back to spirit, so does the life of an individual man (or woman) undergo a similar metamorphosis. In between incarnations his (or her) abode is in the spiritual realms and only after a considerable time does the soul make the pilgrimage into another body of flesh. (At least this is the usual case if you can believe the testimony of those who have clairvoyantly investigated it.)

 

    The rule of life, however, is not just one of endless birth and death but rather one of growth and becoming what one was destined to become.  For an acorn it is to become

an oak tree and for a caterpillar it is to become a moth or a butterfly; but for a man it is to become like his heavenly Father, an immortal being with unlimited power and glory.

("God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him." -Gen. 2:27.  "I have said, ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High." Psalm 82:6)

 

    Like the rest of creation this growth is better when not forced but allowed to unfold in the fullness of time. However, what unfolds in man depends upon the seeds he plants in his mind and waters regularly.  The seeds are his thoughts, hopes, dreams, and beliefs.  The German poet, Goethe, expresses this planting, watering and growth cycle eloquently:

 

   "Plant a thought, and reap a deed.

    Plant a deed, and reap a habit.

    Plant a habit, and reap a character.

    Plant a character, and reap a destiny."

 

    More simply: "As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he." If you can visualize what it is you want clearly and hold fast to that vision, the thing you visualize will come to pass - either good or evil depending on the nature of your thoughts.  Do you remember what Job said after he had lost his family and all of his worldly possessions? "For the thing which I greatly feared is come upon me, and that which I was afraid of is come unto me." (Job 3:25)

 

How much better then is it to recall and meditate on St. Paul's reminder to Timothy not to dwell on one's fears:    "For God hath not given us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." (Timothy 1:7)

 

    [I am tempted to write a few pages at this point on the trinity of "power, and of love, and of a sound mind", but suffice it to remind you only that Dorothy's companions in the Wizard of Oz on her quest for the witch's broomstick were: the cowardly lion who wanted courage (i.e. the power to act), the tin man who wanted a heart (i.e. love), and the scarecrow who wanted a brain (i.e. a sound mind).  These companions plus her four-footed friend, Toto, comprise the septenary nature of

man with his animal (four-fold) and spiritual (three-fold) natures.  Of course, the Wizard (the Great and Powerful Oz) turns out to be a humbug which would take an essay of

its own to expound upon. (Shades of Friedrich Nietzsche and the "God is dead" brand of theologians and existentialists).  The Wizard of Oz is just a modern story of the ancient quest, albeit a very delightful one.]

 

    And Jesus tells us to take no thought ("be not anxious", says one translation) for the morrow, for the problems that each day brings are worry enough.  St. Paul puts the idea of banishing fears and worries in a more positive vein in his epistle to the Phillipians:

 

   " . . . whatever is true, whatever is honest, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is gracious, if there is any excellence, if there is anything

worthy of praise, thing about these things." (Phil. 4:8)

 

    That which distinguishes man from the rest of creation is his power to choose, "You will be what you will to be." Why then, you will surely ask, is there so much misery in

the world: poverty, disease, drug abuse, murders, rapes, robberies, wars , hatred, etc., etc.?  Surely, no one deliberately chooses these things. The debate about the

origin of evil in the world has been going on for thousands of years and has never been satisfactorily resolved.  Even St. Paul speaks of "the mystery of iniquity" and the Book of Revelation mentions "Mystery Babylon". When Jesus was asked by his disciples about a

man born blind, whether it was the man himself or his

parents who had sinned, Jesus answered: "Neither, but that the glory of God might be manifest in him."  Similarly, when St. Paul beseeched the Lord three times to get rid of

his "thorn in the flesh", the Lord replied: "My grace is sufficient for you.  My purpose is made perfect in weakness."

 

    Without shadows we could not see the light.  Unless we experience sadness we cannot know true happiness, and unless there is both good and evil in the world we would not be able to exercise our free will to choose life and growth instead of death and destruction. ("I have set before you Life and Death, blessing and cursing.

Therefore, choose Life that thou and thy seed may live." Deut. 30:19)  Remember, sin (and the concept of evil) did not enter into man's experience until Eve was tempted by the serpent (i.e. Satan) to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge whereby she and Adam would know the difference between good and evil and become like gods.  As Shakespeare tells

us through the voice of Hamlet: "for nothing is either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." (Act II, Scene II).When man in his evolution reaches the point of self-nsciousness, a separate individual, he begins to lose his close association with his creator and thus also his identity with all creation - his "participation mystique", as Levy-Bruhl calls it.  The fall from the Garden of Eden and therefore separation from God has begun, and the

journey back to Paradise is a long one.

 

    Dualism the awareness of opposites, goes hand in hand with the development of self-consciousness.  What we identify with becomes part of the ego consciousness and what we exclude as not belonging to it becomes part of that which is outside of us or is repressed by the ego into the subconscious portion of the mind.  When we only identify with our good qualities and exclude our bad ones, we tend to become "holier than thou" and look down our

noses at those less perfect than we are.  In Jesus'day many of the "scribes and pharisees", those most knowlegeable about the Judaic and Mosaic laws, fit into this

category.  He repeatedly called their self-overevaluation to their attention:

 

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.  Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.  Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity." (Matthew 23:25-28)

 

    The first step, therefore, on the road back to our original state as a spiritual being is to admit our sins and imperfections and not to place ourselves in our minds above other people in "goodness".  Jesus reminds us to: "Judge not that ye be not judged.  For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again." (Matthew 7:1-2)

 

    In order for constructive growth to occur much of what we have considered true and real must be seen as false and as illusion.  In order to find a new and greater life we

must lose the old and lesser life.  Just as the outer self, the persona, is a mask through which the actor speaks his part, so too is the ego nothing but a reflection, a shadow really, of our true self.  Jesus tells us: "He that findeth his life shall lose it; and he

that loseth his life for my sake shall find it." (Matthew 10:39).  Again in one of the other gospels he says: "Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit." (John 12:24).

 

    We must therefore discard the old man (our carnal self) and put on the new man (our spiritual self, our Christ self).  For you cannot put new wine in old wineskins or mend an old garment with a piece of new cloth. "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new

creation; the old has passed away; behold, the new has come." (2nd Corinthians 5:17). "And the Spirit and the bride say, come.  And let him that is athirst come.  And

whosover will, let him take the water of life freely." (Revelations 22:17).  For "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life.  No man cometh to the Father except by me." (John 14:6).

 

 

   "Build thee more stately mansions, O my soul As the swift seasons roll.

    Leave thy low-vaulted past.    Let each new temple, nobler than the last,

    Separate thee from heaven with a dome more vast     Till thou at length art free

    Leaving thine outgrown shell by life's unresting sea."

 

                            (From the Chambered Nautilus  by Oliver Wendell Holmes )

 

    For most people the quest is a goal that they seek from time to time but not one that requires all of their energies.  For those who are fortunate enough to have glimpsed "the heavenly city", "the promised land", the quest becomes an all-consuming effort, a constant

attraction; and like the moth that is attracted by the light and flame they may, if not careful, may be consumed by it.

 

         "So come my Sovereign, enter in.

         Let new and nobler life begin.

         Thy Holy Spirit guide us on

         Until the glorious crown be won."

 

                        (George Weissel, 1642)

 

        "Spirit divine, attend our prayer,

         And make this house thy home;

         Descend with all thy gracious power,

         O come, Great Spirit, come!"

 

                        (Andrew Reed, 1829)

 

       "Come Holy Ghost, our souls inspire,

        And lighten with celestial fire.

        Thou the anointing Spirit art,

        Who dost thy sev'n fold gifts impart.

 

        Thy bless-ed unction from above

        Is comfort, life, and fire of love.

        Enable with perpetual light

        The dullness of our blinded sight.

 

        Anoint and cheer our soiled face

        With the abundance of thy grace.

        Keep far our foes; give peace at home;

        Where Thou art guide no ill can come.

 

        Teach us to know the Father, Son,

        And Thee of both, to be but One.

        That through the ages all along,

        This may be our endless song:

 

        Praise to thy eternal merit,

        Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

  

                    (9th Century, Latin prayer now used in

                     the Anglican Church by the Bishop at

                     the rite of confirmation.)

 

 

END  OF  PART I